39ad66bded fix: correct scope validation in token exchange (#12312)
## Which Problems Are Solved

The v4.15.3 token exchange hardening (`#12319`, `#12322`) introduced two
regressions:

1. **Logic bug**: scope validation used intersection (`!inSubject ||
!inActor`) instead of union, so any explicit `scope` on a `user_id`
subject always failed — even `openid` when present on the actor token.
2. **Design gap**: even with union logic, scope-less subjects
(`user_id`, `id_token`) cannot satisfy a rule that requires all
requested scopes to exist on input tokens. This breaks documented
impersonation flows (e.g. service account actor + `user_id` subject
requesting `email`).

## How the Problems Are Solved

- **Standard exchange** (no actor, or subject carries scopes): keep
union validation — requested scopes must be ⊆ subject ∪ actor. For plain
exchange this is effectively a subset of the subject token.
- **Scope-less subject impersonation** (`user_id`, `id_token` on actor
path): split validation:
- **Subject-data scopes** (`openid`, `profile`, `email`, …): client
allowlist only
- **Authorization scopes** (`offline_access`, `:aud`, `projects:roles`,
`role:*`): still ⊆ subject ∪ actor
- Restore subject → actor fallback when `scope` is omitted.

GHSA protections remain: cross-client token binding and
authorization-scope escalation are still rejected.

Closes #12319
Closes #12322

## Additional Changes

- Unit tests for scope validators (`token_exchange_test.go`)
- Integration tests covering `user_id`/`id_token` paths, union-path
rejection, and client-credentials actor → `user_id` exchange

## Additional Context

- Relates to https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v4.15.3
- Security fix: GHSA-vrh8-c9cm-wh8v

---------

Co-authored-by: Cursor <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 12:33:11 +00:00
2026-07-09 13:28:09 +02:00
2023-07-17 10:08:20 +02:00
2024-07-26 22:39:55 +02:00
2021-02-08 16:48:41 +01:00
2025-04-02 16:53:06 +02:00
2026-02-04 11:51:43 +01:00
2026-06-04 14:33:04 +02:00
2026-02-25 19:36:00 -03:00
2026-06-10 11:53:26 +00:00

ZITADEL Logo ZITADEL Logo

GitHub Workflow Status (with event) GitHub contributors

The Identity Infrastructure for Developers

ZITADEL is an open-source identity and access management platform built for teams that need more than basic auth. Whether you're securing a SaaS product, building a B2B platform, or self-hosting a production IAM stack — ZITADEL gives you everything out of the box: SSO, MFA, Passkeys, OIDC, SAML, SCIM, and a battle-tested multi-tenancy model.

No vendor lock-in. No compromise on control. Just a robust, API-first identity platform you can own.


🏡 Website  |  💬 Chat  |  📋 Docs  |  🧑‍💻 Blog  |  📞 Contact


Why ZITADEL

We built ZITADEL to handle the hardest IAM challenges at scale — starting with multi-tenancy.

ZITADEL FusionAuth Keycloak Auth0/Okta
Open-source ✅ ❌ ✅ ❌
Self-hostable ✅ ✅ ✅ ❌
Infrastructure-level tenants ✅ Instances (High scale) ✅ Tenants 🟡 Realms (Scaling limits) ❌ (Multi-tenant = multi-account)
B2B Organizations ✅ Native & Unlimited 🟡 via Entity Management ✅ (Recent addition) 🟡 (Plan/Account dependent)
Full audit trail ✅ Comprehensive Event Stream* 🟡 Audit logs 🟡 Audit logs 🟡 Audit logs
Passkeys (FIDO2) ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
Actions / webhooks ✅ ✅ 🟡 via SPI ✅
API-first (gRPC + REST) ✅ 🟡 REST only 🟡 REST only 🟡 REST only
SaaS + self-host parity ✅ ✅ ➖ N/A ➖ N/A

ZITADEL Cloud and self-hosted ZITADEL run the same codebase.

Key differentiators for architects:

  • Relational core, event-driven soul — every mutation is written as an immutable event for a complete, API-accessible audit trail. Unlike systems that log only select activities, ZITADEL provides a comprehensive event stream that can be audited or streamed to external systems via Webhooks.
  • Strict multi-tenant hierarchy — Identity System → Organizations → Projects, with isolated data and policy scoping at multiple levels
  • API-first design — every resource and action is available via connectRPC, gRPC, and HTTP/JSON APIs
  • Zero-downtime updates and horizontal scalability without external session stores

Get Started in 3 Minutes

👉 Quick Start Guide

ZITADEL Self-Hosted

# Docker Compose — up and running in under 3 minutes
curl -LO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zitadel/zitadel/main/deploy/compose/docker-compose.yml \
  && curl -LO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zitadel/zitadel/main/deploy/compose/.env.example \
  && cp .env.example .env \
  && docker compose up -d --wait

Full deployment guides:

Need professional support for your self-hosted deployment? Contact us.

ZITADEL Cloud (SaaS)

Start for free at zitadel.com — no credit card required. Available in US · EU · AU · CH. Pay-as-you-go pricing.


Integrate with the V2 API

ZITADEL exposes every capability over a typed API. Here's how to create a user with the V2 REST API:

curl -X POST https://$ZITADEL_DOMAIN/v2/users/human \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ACCESS_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "username": "[email protected]",
    "profile": { "givenName": "Alice", "familyName": "Smith" },
    "email": { "email": "[email protected]", "sendCode": {} }
  }'

Explore the full API reference — including connectRPC and gRPC transports — or jump straight to quickstart examples.


Features

Authentication

Multi-Tenancy

Integration

Self-Service & Admin

Deployment

Track upcoming features on our roadmap and follow our changelog for recent updates.


Showcase

Login V2

Our new, fully customizable login experience — documentation


Adopters & Ecosystem

Used in production by organizations worldwide. See the full Adopters list — and add yours by submitting a pull request.


How To Contribute

ZITADEL is built in the open and welcoming to contributions of all kinds.

Contributors

Made with contrib.rocks.


Security

Security policy: SECURITY.md

Vulnerability Disclosure Policy — how to responsibly report security issues.

Technical Advisories are published for major issues that could impact security or stability in production.

License

AGPL-3.0 — see LICENSING.md for the full licensing policy, including Apache 2.0 and MIT exceptions for specific directories.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme AGPL-3.0
510 MiB
Languages
Go 74.6%
TypeScript 12%
MDX 7.9%
HTML 2.6%
SCSS 1.2%
Other 1.7%