10a66b786b fix(login): honour login_hint and skip the auto-submit loop in OIDC flow (#12431)
<!--
Please inform yourself about the contribution guidelines on submitting a
PR here:

https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#submit-a-pull-request-pr.
Take note of how PR/commit titles should
be written and replace the template texts in the sections below. Don't
remove any of the sections. It is important that the
  commit history clearly shows what is changed and why.
Important: By submitting a contribution you agree to the terms from our
Licensing Policy as described here:

https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/LICENSING.md#community-contributions.
  -->

  # Which Problems Are Solved

An OIDC authorize request that carries a `login_hint` (and no `prompt`)
is meant to land
the user on a **prefilled** login screen and let them proceed straight
to authentication.
  Two problems prevented that:

**1. The hint was dropped when an unrelated session existed.** When the
browser held a
  `sessions` cookie for a *different* account:

- The user was redirected to the **account picker** (`/accounts`)
instead of the
    prefilled login-name screen.
- The picker listed the already-logged-in, unrelated account(s) — never
the user
    identified by `login_hint`.
- The `login_hint` was **silently dropped** (the `/accounts` URL carries
no hint), so the
    typed email was lost and the flow dead-ended on the wrong accounts.

In a clean session (no `sessions` cookie) the same request prefilled
correctly, which
  made the bug depend on unrelated pre-existing sessions.

**2. The prefilled path was jarring and looped on "back".** Even when
the hint *was*
honoured, the flow redirected to `/loginname?loginName=…&submit=true`.
That page renders
the username screen and then **client-side auto-submits** it, so the
user sees the
username flash on screen, watches "Continue" click itself, and only then
lands on the
password step. Worse, `/loginname?submit=true` stays in browser history,
so pressing
**Back** from the password screen re-triggers the auto-submit and
bounces the user
straight forward again — an inescapable loop with no way to edit the
username.

  # How the Problems Are Solved

**Honour the hint (problem 1).** In `handleOIDCFlowInitiation`, the
default branch (no
`prompt`) already calls `findValidSession`, which filters the browser's
sessions by
`login_hint` and treats the hint as *selecting the user*. When the hint
matches none of
the sessions it returns `undefined`, and the remaining
`eligibleSessions` (filtered by
organization only) are therefore never the hinted user. The fallback
previously chose
  between the loginname screen and the account picker based solely on
`eligibleSessions.length === 0`, so a present-but-unrelated session sent
the user to
`gotoAccounts`, discarding the email. The loginname branch is now also
gated on
`authRequest.loginHint`, mirroring the existing empty-eligible-sessions
branch.

**Skip the flash and the loop (problem 2).** Instead of bouncing through
`/loginname?submit=true` and relying on client-side auto-submit, the
hint is now resolved
**server-side** via `sendLoginname` (the same approach the
`Prompt.LOGIN` branch already
used) and the user is redirected **straight to the next step** (e.g.
`/password`),
skipping the `/loginname` screen entirely. This is factored into a
shared
`resolveLoginHint` helper and applied to all `login_hint` branches
(default-prompt,
no-session, and the existing `Prompt.LOGIN` path, now deduplicated).
When the hint can't
be resolved (unknown/ambiguous user, transient error), the flow falls
back to a prefilled
`/loginname` **without** `submit=true` — a clean screen where the user
clicks once — so
  there is no auto-submit and no back-button loop in any path.

  ```ts
  if (!selectedSession || !selectedSession.id) {
// login_hint matches no session: resolve it straight to the next step.
    if (authRequest.loginHint) {
const hintResponse = await resolveLoginHint({ request, requestId,
loginHint: authRequest.loginHint, organization });
      if (hintResponse) {
        return hintResponse;
      }
    }
// Prefill loginname (not the account picker) for an unresolved hint or
when no session is eligible.
    if (authRequest.loginHint || eligibleSessions.length === 0) {
return gotoLoginname({ request, requestId, loginHint:
authRequest.loginHint, organization, orgDomain });
    }
return gotoAccounts({ request, requestId, organization, orgDomain });
  }
  ```

  Resulting behaviour:

- `login_hint` set, a session **matches** it → silent auth
(**unchanged**).
- `login_hint` set, **no** session matches, hint **resolves** → straight
to the next step
(e.g. `/password`), no `/loginname` flash (**was**: account picker with
the hint
    dropped / a jarring auto-submit screen).
- `login_hint` set, hint **can't** be resolved → prefilled `/loginname`,
no auto-submit,
    Back stays editable.
- **No** `login_hint` → account picker / loginname exactly as before
(**unchanged**).

  # Additional Changes

- `resolveLoginHint` helper extracted in `flow-initiation.ts`; the
`Prompt.LOGIN` branch
    now reuses it instead of duplicating the `sendLoginname` call.
- `submit=true` is no longer emitted for the login-name flow, so the
client-side
auto-submit in `username-form.tsx` is no longer reached from OIDC
initiation.
- Tests in `flow-initiation.test.ts`: each `login_hint` branch
(org-scope-filtered,
unrelated-session, no-session) is covered twice — hint resolves →
straight to
`/password`; hint unresolved → prefilled `/loginname` with **no**
`submit=true`.

  # Additional Context

- The org-only `eligibleSessions` check was introduced in #12346, which
correctly handled
the *empty* case but did not account for a present-but-unmatched
`login_hint`; this PR
    extends that gate.
- Per OIDC, `login_hint` is advisory prefill; a client that wants the
chooser would send
`prompt=select_account`. Resolving the hint server-side also matches how
the
    `Prompt.LOGIN` branch already behaved.

---------

Co-authored-by: Max Peintner <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Max Peintner <[email protected]>
2026-07-29 12:06:36 +00:00
2026-07-29 05:50:40 +02:00
2023-07-17 10:08:20 +02:00
2024-07-26 22:39:55 +02:00
2021-02-08 16:48:41 +01:00
2025-04-02 16:53:06 +02:00
2026-02-04 11:51:43 +01:00
2026-06-04 14:33:04 +02:00
2026-02-25 19:36:00 -03:00
2026-06-10 11:53:26 +00:00

ZITADEL Logo ZITADEL Logo

GitHub Workflow Status (with event) GitHub contributors

The Identity Infrastructure for Developers

ZITADEL is an open-source identity and access management platform built for teams that need more than basic auth. Whether you're securing a SaaS product, building a B2B platform, or self-hosting a production IAM stack — ZITADEL gives you everything out of the box: SSO, MFA, Passkeys, OIDC, SAML, SCIM, and a battle-tested multi-tenancy model.

No vendor lock-in. No compromise on control. Just a robust, API-first identity platform you can own.


🏡 Website  |  💬 Chat  |  📋 Docs  |  🧑‍💻 Blog  |  📞 Contact


Why ZITADEL

We built ZITADEL to handle the hardest IAM challenges at scale — starting with multi-tenancy.

ZITADEL FusionAuth Keycloak Auth0/Okta
Open-source ✅ ❌ ✅ ❌
Self-hostable ✅ ✅ ✅ ❌
Infrastructure-level tenants ✅ Instances (High scale) ✅ Tenants 🟡 Realms (Scaling limits) ❌ (Multi-tenant = multi-account)
B2B Organizations ✅ Native & Unlimited 🟡 via Entity Management ✅ (Recent addition) 🟡 (Plan/Account dependent)
Full audit trail ✅ Comprehensive Event Stream* 🟡 Audit logs 🟡 Audit logs 🟡 Audit logs
Passkeys (FIDO2) ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
Actions / webhooks ✅ ✅ 🟡 via SPI ✅
API-first (gRPC + REST) ✅ 🟡 REST only 🟡 REST only 🟡 REST only
SaaS + self-host parity ✅ ✅ ➖ N/A ➖ N/A

ZITADEL Cloud and self-hosted ZITADEL run the same codebase.

Key differentiators for architects:

  • Relational core, event-driven soul — every mutation is written as an immutable event for a complete, API-accessible audit trail. Unlike systems that log only select activities, ZITADEL provides a comprehensive event stream that can be audited or streamed to external systems via Webhooks.
  • Strict multi-tenant hierarchy — Identity System → Organizations → Projects, with isolated data and policy scoping at multiple levels
  • API-first design — every resource and action is available via connectRPC, gRPC, and HTTP/JSON APIs
  • Zero-downtime updates and horizontal scalability without external session stores

Get Started in 3 Minutes

👉 Quick Start Guide

ZITADEL Self-Hosted

# Docker Compose — up and running in under 3 minutes
curl -LO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zitadel/zitadel/main/deploy/compose/docker-compose.yml \
  && curl -LO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zitadel/zitadel/main/deploy/compose/.env.example \
  && cp .env.example .env \
  && docker compose up -d --wait

Full deployment guides:

Need professional support for your self-hosted deployment? Contact us.

ZITADEL Cloud (SaaS)

Start for free at zitadel.com — no credit card required. Available in US · EU · AU · CH. Pay-as-you-go pricing.


Integrate with the V2 API

ZITADEL exposes every capability over a typed API. Here's how to create a user with the V2 REST API:

curl -X POST https://$ZITADEL_DOMAIN/v2/users/human \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ACCESS_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "username": "[email protected]",
    "profile": { "givenName": "Alice", "familyName": "Smith" },
    "email": { "email": "[email protected]", "sendCode": {} }
  }'

Explore the full API reference — including connectRPC and gRPC transports — or jump straight to quickstart examples.


Features

Authentication

Multi-Tenancy

Integration

Self-Service & Admin

Deployment

Track upcoming features on our roadmap and follow our changelog for recent updates.


Showcase

Login V2

Our new, fully customizable login experience — documentation


Adopters & Ecosystem

Used in production by organizations worldwide. See the full Adopters list — and add yours by submitting a pull request.


How To Contribute

ZITADEL is built in the open and welcoming to contributions of all kinds.

Contributors

Made with contrib.rocks.


Security

Security policy: SECURITY.md

Vulnerability Disclosure Policy — how to responsibly report security issues.

Technical Advisories are published for major issues that could impact security or stability in production.

License

AGPL-3.0 — see LICENSING.md for the full licensing policy, including Apache 2.0 and MIT exceptions for specific directories.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme AGPL-3.0
510 MiB
Languages
Go 74.6%
TypeScript 12%
MDX 7.9%
HTML 2.6%
SCSS 1.2%
Other 1.7%