Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Gayathri VijayanandGitHub fe3ccc85d6 fix: invite code generation after multiple verification failures (#10323)
<!--
Please inform yourself about the contribution guidelines on submitting a
PR here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#submit-a-pull-request-pr.
Take note of how PR/commit titles should be written and replace the
template texts in the sections below. Don't remove any of the sections.
It is important that the commit history clearly shows what is changed
and why.
Important: By submitting a contribution you agree to the terms from our
Licensing Policy as described here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/LICENSING.md#community-contributions.
-->

# Which Problems Are Solved

If a wrong verification code is used three or more times during
verification, or if the verification code is expired, the user state is
marked as
[deleted](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/internal/command/user_v2_invite_model.go#L69).
This prevents the creation of a new code with the following
[error](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/internal/command/user_v2_invite.go#L60):
`Errors.User.NotFound`.
This PR aims to fix this bug.  

# How the Problems Are Solved

This issue is solved by invalidating the previously issued invite code
and setting the value of `UserV2InviteWriteModel.CodeReturned` as
`false`

# Additional Changes
N/A

# Additional Context
- Closes #9860 
- Follow-up: API doc update
2025-07-24 21:09:48 +02:00
8fff45d8f4 fix(scim): add a metadata config to ignore random password sent during SCIM create (#10296)
<!--
Please inform yourself about the contribution guidelines on submitting a
PR here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#submit-a-pull-request-pr.
Take note of how PR/commit titles should be written and replace the
template texts in the sections below. Don't remove any of the sections.
It is important that the commit history clearly shows what is changed
and why.
Important: By submitting a contribution you agree to the terms from our
Licensing Policy as described here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/LICENSING.md#community-contributions.
-->

# Which Problems Are Solved

Okta sends a random password in the request to create a user during SCIM
provisioning, irrespective of whether the `Sync Password` option is
enabled or disabled on Okta, and this password does not comply with the
default password complexity set in Zitadel. This PR adds a workaround to
create users without issues in such cases.

# How the Problems Are Solved

- A new metadata configuration called
`urn:zitadel:scim:ignorePasswordOnCreate` is added to the Machine User
that is used for provisioning
- During SCIM user creation requests, if the
`urn:zitadel:scim:ignorePasswordOnCreate` is set to `true` in the
Machine User's metadata, the password set in the create request is
ignored

# Additional Changes

# Additional Context

The random password is ignored (if set in the metadata) only during
customer creation. This change does not affect SCIM password updates.

- Closes #10009

---------

Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
2025-07-23 10:47:05 +02:00
6d11145c77 fix(saml): Push AuthenticationSucceededOnApplication milestone for SAML sessions (#10263)
# Which Problems Are Solved

The SAML session (v2 login) currently does not push a
`AuthenticationSucceededOnApplication` milestone upon successful SAML
login for the first time. The changes in this PR address this issue.

# How the Problems Are Solved

Add a new function to set the appropriate milestone, and call this
function after a successful SAML request.

# Additional Changes

N/A

# Additional Context

- Closes #9592

---------

Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <[email protected]>
2025-07-15 16:03:47 +00:00
Gayathri VijayanandGitHub 0ceec60637 fix: sorting options of the ListInstanceTrustedDomains() gRPC endpoint (#10172)
<!--
Please inform yourself about the contribution guidelines on submitting a
PR here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#submit-a-pull-request-pr.
Take note of how PR/commit titles should be written and replace the
template texts in the sections below. Don't remove any of the sections.
It is important that the commit history clearly shows what is changed
and why.
Important: By submitting a contribution you agree to the terms from our
Licensing Policy as described here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/LICENSING.md#community-contributions.
-->

# Which Problems Are Solved

1. The sorting columns in the gRPC endpoint
`ListInstanceTrustedDomains()` are incorrect, and return the following
error when invalid sorting options are chosen:
```
Unknown (2)
ERROR: missing FROM-clause entry for table "instance_domains" (SQLSTATE 42P01)
```

The sorting columns that are valid to list `instance_trusted_domains`
are
* `trusted_domain_field_name_unspecified`
* `trusted_domain_field_name_domain` 
* `trusted_domain_field_name_creation_date`

However, the currently configured sorting columns are 
* `domain_field_name_unspecified`
* `domain_field_name_domain`
* `domain_field_name_primary`
* `domain_field_name_generated`
* `domain_field_name_creation_date`

Configuring the actual columns of `instance_trusted_domains` makes this
endpoint **backward incompatible**. Therefore, the fix in this PR is to
no longer return an error when an invalid sorting column (non-existing
column) is chosen and to sort the results by `creation_date` for invalid
sorting columns.

2. This PR also fixes the `sorting_column` included in the responses of
both `ListInstanceTrustedDomains()` and `ListInstanceDomains()`
endpoints, as they now point to the default option irrespective of the
chosen option in the request i.e.,
* `TRUSTED_DOMAIN_FIELD_NAME_UNSPECIFIED` in case of
`ListInstanceTrustedDomains()`, and
* `DOMAIN_FIELD_NAME_UNSPECIFIED` in case of `ListInstanceDomains()`

# How the Problems Are Solved

* Map the sorting columns to valid columns of `instance_trusted_domain`
- If the sorting column is not one of the columns, the mapping defaults
to `creation_date`
* Set the `sorting_column` explicitly (from the request) in the
`ListInstanceDomainsResponse` and `ListInstanceTrustedDomainsResponse`

# Additional Changes

A small fix to return the chosen `sorting_column` in the responses of
the `ListInstanceTrustedDomains()` and `ListInstanceDomains()` endpoints

# Additional Context
- Closes #9839
2025-07-08 16:47:43 +02:00