Files
zitadel/apps/docs/content/guides/integrate/actions/testing-response-manipulation.mdx
T
Marco A.andGitHub 6fdb74593c docs: remove outdated Actions v2 feature flag references (#12641)
# Which Problems Are Solved

The docs ([Actions v2 concepts
page](https://zitadel.com/docs/concepts/features/actions_v2) and the
Actions testing guides) state that Actions v2 must be enabled via the
"Actions" feature flag. That flag no longer exists — it is `reserved` in
`proto/zitadel/feature/v2/instance.proto` and `system.proto` — and
Actions v2 is available by default. The callout even linked to a
non-existent API field.

# How the Problems Are Solved

- Removed the stale feature-flag callout (and the roadmap teaser
callout) from `concepts/features/actions_v2.mdx`.
- Removed the "Your ZITADEL instance needs to have the actions feature
enabled." prerequisite bullet from the seven
`guides/integrate/actions/testing-*.mdx` guides.

Pure deletions, 17 lines across 8 files.

# Additional Context

The `SetInstanceFeatures` mentions in `hosted-login.mdx` and
`webkeys.mdx` refer to flags that still exist and are untouched.
2026-08-25 16:58:43 +02:00

336 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext

---
title: Test Actions Response Manipulation
description: "Manipulate API responses in your ZITADEL instance by creating targets that handle specific response events with custom logic"
---
This guide shows you how to leverage the ZITADEL actions feature to manipulate API responses in your ZITADEL instance.
You can use the actions feature to create a target that will be called when a specific API response occurs.
This is useful for triggering workflows based on API responses in ZITADEL. You can even use this to provide data necessary data to the new login UI as shown in this example.
## Prerequisites
Before you start, make sure you have everything set up correctly.
- You need to be at least a ZITADEL [_IAM_OWNER_](/guides/manage/console/administrators)
<Callout>
Note that this guide assumes that ZITADEL is running on the same machine as the target and can be reached via `localhost`.
In case you are using a different setup, you need to adjust the target URL accordingly and will need to make sure that the target is reachable from ZITADEL.
</Callout>
<Callout>
To marshal and unmarshal the request and response please use a package like [protojson](https://pkg.go.dev/google.golang.org/protobuf/encoding/protojson),
as the request and response are protocol buffer messages, to avoid potential problems with the attribute names.
</Callout>
## Start example target
To test the actions feature, you need to create a target that will be called when an API endpoint is called.
You will need to implement a listener that can receive HTTP requests, process the request and returns the manipulated request.
For this example, we will use a simple Go HTTP server that will return the request with added metadata.
<Callout>
The signature of the received request can be checked, [please refer to the example for more information on how to](/guides/integrate/actions/testing-request-signature).
</Callout>
```go
package main
import (
"encoding/json"
"io"
"net/http"
"github.com/zitadel/zitadel-go/v3/pkg/client/zitadel/user/v2"
"google.golang.org/protobuf/encoding/protojson"
)
type contextResponse struct {
Request *retrieveIdentityProviderIntentRequestWrapper `json:"request"`
Response *retrieveIdentityProviderIntentResponseWrapper `json:"response"`
}
// RetrieveIdentityProviderIntentRequestWrapper necessary to marshal and unmarshal the JSON into the proto message correctly
type retrieveIdentityProviderIntentRequestWrapper struct {
user.RetrieveIdentityProviderIntentRequest
}
func (r *retrieveIdentityProviderIntentRequestWrapper) MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error) {
data, err := protojson.Marshal(r)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return data, nil
}
func (r *retrieveIdentityProviderIntentRequestWrapper) UnmarshalJSON(data []byte) error {
return protojson.Unmarshal(data, r)
}
// RetrieveIdentityProviderIntentResponseWrapper necessary to marshal and unmarshal the JSON into the proto message correctly
type retrieveIdentityProviderIntentResponseWrapper struct {
user.RetrieveIdentityProviderIntentResponse
}
func (r *retrieveIdentityProviderIntentResponseWrapper) MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error) {
data, err := protojson.Marshal(r)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return data, nil
}
func (r *retrieveIdentityProviderIntentResponseWrapper) UnmarshalJSON(data []byte) error {
return protojson.Unmarshal(data, r)
}
// call HandleFunc to read the response body, manipulate the content and return the response
func call(w http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
// read the body content
sentBody, err := io.ReadAll(req.Body)
if err != nil {
// if there was an error while reading the body return an error
http.Error(w, "error", http.StatusInternalServerError)
return
}
defer req.Body.Close()
// read the response into the expected structure
request := new(contextResponse)
if err := json.Unmarshal(sentBody, request); err != nil {
http.Error(w, "error", http.StatusInternalServerError)
}
// build the response from the received response
resp := request.Response
// manipulate the received response to send back as response
if resp != nil {
// On the first login the user does not exist yet, so the response contains a CreateUser
// action. On subsequent logins the user already exists and the response contains an
// UpdateUser action instead. Both support setting user metadata directly.
metadata := &user.Metadata{Key: "organization", Value: []byte("company")}
if createUser := resp.GetCreateUser(); createUser != nil {
createUser.Metadata = append(createUser.Metadata, metadata)
}
if updateUser := resp.GetUpdateUser(); updateUser != nil {
updateUser.Metadata = append(updateUser.Metadata, metadata)
}
}
// marshal the response into json
data, err := json.Marshal(resp)
if err != nil {
// if there was an error while marshalling the json
http.Error(w, "error", http.StatusInternalServerError)
return
}
// return the manipulated response
w.Write(data)
}
func main() {
// handle the HTTP call under "/call"
http.HandleFunc("/call", call)
// start an HTTP server with the before defined function to handle the endpoint under "http://localhost:8090"
http.ListenAndServe(":8090", nil)
}
```
<Callout title="">
The example above runs only on your local machine (`localhost`).
To test it with Zitadel, you must make your listener reachable from the internet.
You can do this by using **Webhook.site** (see [Creating a Listener with Webhook.site](./webhook-site-setup)).
</Callout>
## Create target
As you see in the example above the target is created with HTTP and port '8090' and if we want to use it as call, the
target can be created as follows:
See [Create a target](/reference/api/action/zitadel.action.v2.ActionService.CreateTarget) for more detailed information.
```shell
curl -L -X POST 'https://${CUSTOM_DOMAIN}/v2/actions/targets' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H 'Accept: application/json' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer <TOKEN>' \
--data-raw '{
"name": "local call",
"restCall": {
"interruptOnError": true
},
"endpoint": "http://localhost:8090/call",
"timeout": "10s"
}'
```
Save the returned ID to set in the execution.
## Set execution
To call the target just created before, with the intention to manipulate the retrieve of an intent by the user V2 API,
we define an execution with a response condition.
See [Set an execution](/reference/api/action/zitadel.action.v2.ActionService.SetExecution) for more detailed information.
```shell
curl -L -X PUT 'https://${CUSTOM_DOMAIN}/v2/actions/executions' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H 'Accept: application/json' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer <TOKEN>' \
--data-raw '{
"condition": {
"response": {
"method": "/zitadel.user.v2.UserService/RetrieveIdentityProviderIntent"
}
},
"targets": [
"<TargetID returned>"
]
}'
```
## Example call
Now that you have set up the target and execution, you can test it by using a login-flow in the typescript login with an external IDP.
<Callout>
When the user logs in for the first time and does not exist yet, the response contains a `createUser` object (matching the [Create User](/reference/api/user/zitadel.user.v2.UserService.CreateUser) request).
When the user already exists, the response instead contains an `updateUser` object (matching the [Update User](/reference/api/user/zitadel.user.v2.UserService.UpdateUser) request).
Both allow setting user `metadata` directly in the same response.
The previously used `addHumanUser` and `updateHumanUser` objects are deprecated and replaced by `createUser` and `updateUser` respectively.
</Callout>
```json
{
"details": {
"sequence": "599",
"changeDate": "2023-06-15T06:44:26.039444Z",
"resourceOwner": "163840776835432705"
},
"idpInformation": {
"oauth": {
"accessToken": "ya29...",
"idToken": "ey..."
},
"idpId": "218528353504723201",
"userId": "218528353504723202",
"username": "test-user@localhost",
"rawInformation": {
"User": {
"email": "test-user@localhost",
"email_verified": true,
"family_name": "User",
"given_name": "Test",
"hd": "mouse.com",
"locale": "de",
"name": "Minnie Mouse",
"picture": "https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a/AAcKTtf973Q7NH8KzKTMEZELPU9lx45WpQ9FRBuxFdPb=s96-c",
"sub": "111392805975715856637"
}
}
},
"createUser": {
"username": "test-user@localhost",
"human": {
"idpLinks": [
{"idpId": "218528353504723201", "userId": "218528353504723202", "userName": "test-user@localhost"}
],
"profile": {
"givenName": "Test",
"familyName": "User",
"displayName": "Test User",
"preferredLanguage": "de"
},
"email": {
"email": "[email protected]",
"isVerified": true
}
},
"metadata": []
}
}
```
Your server should now manipulate the response to something like the following. Check out
the [Sent information Response](./usage#sent-information-response) payload description.
```json
{
"details": {
"sequence": "599",
"changeDate": "2023-06-15T06:44:26.039444Z",
"resourceOwner": "163840776835432705"
},
"idpInformation": {
"oauth": {
"accessToken": "ya29...",
"idToken": "ey..."
},
"idpId": "218528353504723201",
"userId": "218528353504723202",
"username": "test-user@localhost",
"rawInformation": {
"User": {
"email": "test-user@localhost",
"email_verified": true,
"family_name": "User",
"given_name": "Test",
"hd": "mouse.com",
"locale": "de",
"name": "Minnie Mouse",
"picture": "https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a/AAcKTtf973Q7NH8KzKTMEZELPU9lx45WpQ9FRBuxFdPb=s96-c",
"sub": "111392805975715856637"
}
}
},
"createUser": {
"username": "test-user@localhost",
"human": {
"idpLinks": [
{"idpId": "218528353504723201", "userId": "218528353504723202", "userName": "test-user@localhost"}
],
"profile": {
"givenName": "Test",
"familyName": "User",
"displayName": "Test User",
"preferredLanguage": "de"
},
"email": {
"email": "[email protected]",
"isVerified": true
}
},
"metadata": [
{"key": "organization", "value": "Y29tcGFueQ=="}
]
}
}
```
## Debugging claim mapping issues with external IdPs
The same `RetrieveIdentityProviderIntent` webhook is useful for diagnosing auto-user-creation failures caused by unexpected or missing claims from an external IdP.
A common symptom is an error like:
```
invalid CreateUserRequest.Human.Profile: embedded message failed validation |
caused by: invalid SetHumanProfile.GivenName: value length must be between 1 and 200 runes, inclusive
```
This means ZITADEL received an empty value for `givenName` during auto-creation. The IdP may be sending the claim under a different key than ZITADEL expects (e.g. `Givenname`, `firstname`, or a provider-specific claim name).
**To inspect the raw claims ZITADEL receives from your IdP**, point the execution at a logging endpoint (such as [Webhook.site](./webhook-site-setup)) instead of a manipulation handler. Trigger a login with the external IdP and look at the `rawInformation` field in the payload — this contains the unmodified claims exactly as ZITADEL received them.
Compare the claim keys in `rawInformation` against what ZITADEL maps to standard profile fields. If the IdP uses a non-standard key, you can remap it in the same webhook by setting `createUser.human.profile.givenName` from the correct source field before returning the response.
## Conclusion
You have successfully set up a target and execution to manipulate API responses in your ZITADEL instance.
This feature can now be used to add necessary information for applications including the new login UI.
Find more information about the actions feature in the [API documentation](/concepts/features/actions_v2).