# Which Problems Are Solved
The org is migrating from label-based issue classification to GitHub
Issue Types. Issue templates that hardcode `labels:` silently re-add
those labels every time an issue is opened, which blocks the label
cleanup. The `docs` label is also being renamed to `area/docs`, and a
couple of Dependabot labels are being aligned with the new naming
scheme.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Issue templates (these already declare a `type:`, so the deprecated
label is simply removed rather than duplicating the type):
- `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/BUG_REPORT.yaml` — removed `labels: ["bug"]`
(keeps existing `type: Bug`)
- `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/enhancement.yaml` — removed `labels:
["enhancement"]` (keeps existing `type: enhancement`)
- `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/docs.yaml` — `labels: ["docs"]` → `labels:
["area/docs"]`
# Additional Changes
`.github/dependabot.yml` — renamed deprecated label strings in the
`labels:` blocks (the `package-ecosystem` identifiers are left
unchanged):
- `"npm"` → `"javascript"`
- `"gomod"` → `"go"`
- `"documentation"` → `"area/docs"`
# Additional Context
Part of the org-wide migration from label-based issue classification to
GitHub Issue Types.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01MA7kgVw1fjMW32K7FyPASQ)_
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <[email protected]>
* chore: add database questions to bug report template
Sometimes we get bug reports that are only reproducible when zitadel is running against a certain database.
This change adds database related questions to the issue template, as it is something people don't tend to describe in the detail fields.
* fix syntax error
Provide link to the product management in the issue's markdown instead of description. This allows people to actually follow the link when creating an issue.
mffapandGitHub
FabiandGitHub
