Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
8e82ec1cb9 Merge commit from fork
* Add DenyLists parsing

* Remove unneeded returned error

* Plug global denylist into Command

* app creation: apply denylist to backchannel logout URI

* Inject denylist to backchannel logout worker

* webhook config: validate against blocked URLs

* Add notificationsWebhook denylist target

* command: Add SMTP endpoint validation against blocklist

* command: Add SMS endpoint validation against blocklist

* Validate webhook endpoint against denylist on channel notification

* Remove unused tests

* handle deprecated denylists

* remove unintended denylist entry in deprecated list

* use single http client

* fix tests

* update comments

* fixes

* cleanup

* address comments

* fix merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <[email protected]>
2026-06-15 15:36:14 +02:00
Marco A.andGitHub b2532e9666 Merge commit from fork
* Inject DenyList from config to `StartCommands()`

* Implementation draft

* Move address checker to separate package

* Migrate usages of actions.AddressChecker to denylist.AddressChecker

* Rename denylist package files

* Pass []denylist.AddressChecker to StartCommand

* Add DenyList to defaults.yaml and add custom config parser

* net: add HostnameToIPList function

* denylist: Add IsHostBlocked()

* actions: use denylist.IsHostBlocked()

* command: Inject ip lookup function + extend add target validationt test

* command: Unexport ChangeTarget.IsValid()

* command: Add denyList check on ChangeTarget validation

* command: Export ActionsV2DenyList and IPLookupFunction params

* Lint fix

* Check denylist during action execution

* Fix integration tests

* Apply suggestions

* Add `mapstructure.StringToSliceHookFunc()` to decode `HTTPConfigDecodeHook`
2026-02-25 06:33:28 +01:00
791d0587aa feat(action v2): add JWT and JWE payload type options (#11196)
# Which Problems Are Solved

The payload in actions V2 is currently sent as JSON to the target
endpoint. It might get exposed to intermediary infrastructure or logging
systems.
For these scenarios there needs to be an application-layer encryption,
where the provider of the endpoint can define an key to be used for the
encryption.

# How the Problems Are Solved

- Added an additional option to the target to specify the payload type:
`JSON` (current and default), `JWT`, `JWE` (api and console)
- added endpoints to upload and manage public keys (to be used for
encryption) for a target
- updated all action v2 executions (interceptors, oidc, saml, ...) to
provide the `GetActiveSigningWebKey` from queries
- implemented jwt and jwe in the exections incl. refactoring of code and
tests
- changes to the authn_keys table:
  - added a `fingerprint` column
  - dropped not null constraint on expiration
- moved the `GetSignerOnce` into its own package to prevent circular
dependencies

# Additional Changes

None

# Additional Context

closes #11061

---------

Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: conblem <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Silvan <[email protected]>
2025-12-29 13:35:53 +00:00
51e12e224d feat(actionsv2): Propagate request headers in actions v2 (#10632)
# Which Problems Are Solved

This PR adds functionality to propagate request headers in actions v2. 

# How the Problems Are Solved
The new functionality is added to the`ExecutionHandler` interceptors,
where the incoming request headers (from a list of allowed headers to be
forwarded) are set in the payload of the request before calling the
target.

# Additional Changes
This PR also contains minor fixes to the Actions V2 example docs. 

# Additional Context
- Closes #9941

---------

Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
2025-09-08 08:50:52 +00:00
a9ebc06c77 perf(actionsv2): execution target router (#10564)
# Which Problems Are Solved

The event execution system currently uses a projection handler that
subscribes to and processes all events for all instances. This creates a
high static cost because the system over-fetches event data, handling
many events that are not needed by most instances. This inefficiency is
also reflected in high "rows returned" metrics in the database.

# How the Problems Are Solved

Eliminate the use of a project handler. Instead, events for which
"execution targets" are defined, are directly pushed to the queue by the
eventstore. A Router is populated in the Instance object in the authz
middleware.

- By joining the execution targets to the instance, no additional
queries are needed anymore.
- As part of the instance object, execution targets are now cached as
well.
- Events are queued within the same transaction, giving transactional
guarantees on delivery.
- Uses the "insert many fast` variant of River. Multiple jobs are queued
in a single round-trip to the database.
- Fix compatibility with PostgreSQL 15

# Additional Changes

- The signing key was stored as plain-text in the river job payload in
the DB. This violated our [Secrets
Storage](https://zitadel.com/docs/concepts/architecture/secrets#secrets-storage)
principle. This change removed the field and only uses the encrypted
version of the signing key.
- Fixed the target ordering from descending to ascending.
- Some minor linter warnings on the use of `io.WriteString()`.

# Additional Context

- Introduced in https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/9249
- Closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10553
- Closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/9832
- Closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10372
- Closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10492

---------

Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <[email protected]>
2025-09-01 07:21:10 +02:00
9ebf2316c6 feat: exchange gRPC server implementation to connectRPC (#10145)
# Which Problems Are Solved

The current maintained gRPC server in combination with a REST (grpc)
gateway is getting harder and harder to maintain. Additionally, there
have been and still are issues with supporting / displaying `oneOf`s
correctly.
We therefore decided to exchange the server implementation to
connectRPC, which apart from supporting connect as protocol, also also
"standard" gRCP clients as well as HTTP/1.1 / rest like clients, e.g.
curl directly call the server without any additional gateway.

# How the Problems Are Solved

- All v2 services are moved to connectRPC implementation. (v1 services
are still served as pure grpc servers)
- All gRPC server interceptors were migrated / copied to a corresponding
connectRPC interceptor.
- API.ListGrpcServices and API. ListGrpcMethods were changed to include
the connect services and endpoints.
- gRPC server reflection was changed to a `StaticReflector` using the
`ListGrpcServices` list.
- The `grpc.Server` interfaces was split into different combinations to
be able to handle the different cases (grpc server and prefixed gateway,
connect server with grpc gateway, connect server only, ...)
- Docs of services serving connectRPC only with no additional gateway
(instance, webkey, project, app, org v2 beta) are changed to expose that
- since the plugin is not yet available on buf, we download it using
`postinstall` hook of the docs

# Additional Changes

- WebKey service is added as v2 service (in addition to the current
v2beta)

# Additional Context

closes #9483

---------

Co-authored-by: Elio Bischof <[email protected]>
2025-07-04 14:06:20 +00:00