# Which Problems Are Solved
As part of moving the session API to the relational database, this PR
adds the functionality to delete sessions through the session API v2 and
the OIDC end_session endpoint.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- added `SessionDeleteCommand` in domain package
- added possibility to pass the session token verifier to the domain
package
- use feature flag to switch API and OIDC usage from CQRS to relation
table
- added a `permissionCheck` condition to let permissions be checked
directly in the repository / sql
- part of it is still a placeholder until actual permission tables are
done
- added a `session_deleted` table to store (recently) deleted sessions
to handle necessary checks / cases like delete my own session, which
needs to be idempotent
# Additional Changes
Fixed `Matches` function of `existsCondition` (as missing an
implementation)
# Additional Context
- closes#11037
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
As part of #11035 , this PR implements the user check logic for session
validation
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Add user and session repositories as invoke options, as well as their
mocks to prepare the ground for testing
- Implement the logic for the UserCheck command, following what has been
done on eventstore side
- Add a session permission chek interface to be used during the
`Validate()` part of the Commander
# Additional Context
This is a cherry-picked PR + minor changes, coming from
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/11164
- Relates to #11035
---------
Co-authored-by: Silvan <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
This PR implements the endpoints listed in
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10444 .
# How the Problems Are Solved
The implementation follows the same pattern as the Instance one. The
`Add` and `Remove` are implementing the `Commander` interface, while
`List` Domains endpoints are implementing the `Querier` interace.
The PR adds also some forgotten calls to the relational logic for the
Instance API. The commits are identifiable by the label `instance:`
prepended to them. This is the complete list: bafce01b0 , 6fe7257ab ,
e27bc9c34 , 8133ede73 , fde667953 , a3e1135ed , ee1a6f9c1
# Additional Context
- Closes#10444
---------
Co-authored-by: Elio Bischof <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lebogang Phoshoko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Wim Van Laer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Max Peintner <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gayathri Vijayan <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
This PR implements the endpoints listed in
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10443 .
# How the Problems Are Solved
The implementation follows the same pattern as the Organization one.
There are no peculiarities to this PR. The `Update`, `Delete` are
implementing the `Commander` interface, while `Get` and `List`
instance(s) endpoints are implementing the `Querier` interace.
# Additional Context
- Closes#10443
- Depends on #10445
# Which Problems Are Solved
There is no implementation of the permission framework in the new
command pattern. We risk forgetting permission options as we are already
migrating the service layer to the new pattern.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Use an permission checker interface, which will be a sub-interface of
the Permission Repository. The permission checker is passed in the
command executor and invoker as part of the command options. From here
the implementation can call the correct permission method.
This PR proposes a check method for each
[level](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/wiki/Internal-AuthZ#levels).
# Additional Changes
- none
# Additional Context
- Draft design:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/wiki/Internal-AuthZ#enforcement
- Related for queries: https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/10756
Tim MöhlmannandGitHub