# Which Problems Are Solved
In the context of moving our datastore to relational tables, Identity
Provider Intents have no definition of a relational table nor any DB API
that can be used to store the IDP intents as relational objects.
# How the Problems Are Solved
The PR follows the guidelines left in #11190
- A table `zitadel.identity_provider_intents` is created: it defines its
relational constraints (foreign keys) with the other tables, as well as
an ENUM to represent the state of the intent.
- An IDP Intent repository has been created, which offers CRUD
operations implemented as `Create`, `Get`, `Update` and `Delete` methods
for the IDP intent.
- The repository also defines all columns and conditions useful for
performing DB operations on the IDP intents.
- DB mocks have been added as well to ease testing on the `domain`
package.
- Reduction functions have been implemented for the existing IDP events
so to keep the relational table in sync with the event store.
# Additional Changes
To allow testing LDAP intent flow, the `Session.FetchUser()` method has
been extracted to a separate file. A corresponding mock has been created
as well in `fetch_user_mock.go`. The files are mutually excluded and
added at build time through go build tags: the mock is added when the
`integration` tag is specified, while the real implementation is added
when the same tag IS NOT added to the build tags.
# Additional Context
- Closes#11190
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Silvan <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
The following terms have all been renamed to management console:
- Customer Portal (when used to mean the console)
- Console
- Admin Console
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Search & Replace smartly
- Use Copilot for translation files
Changes done to: backend + frontend codebase, docs, translations and
protobufs (descriptions only)
# Additional Context
- Partially Closes#11279
# Which Problems Are Solved
As part of going to a relation storage model, we need to implement the
repository for handling sessions and their events.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Adds a migration step to create the necessary tables and types in the
database.
- Adds the repository implementation for sessions.
- Implements a projection handler for session events to handle the
events written by the old command handlers.
- Updates the `Session` type and `SessionRepository` interface:
- added `CreatorID`
- Adjusted `Delete` method to return amount of affected columns
- Removed sub-repository clumns from the main interface
- Added `CreatorIDCondition`, `ExpirationCondition`, `ExistsFactor` and
`ExistsMetadata`
- Removed `SetUserAgent`
- Methods of `SessionFactor` and `SessionChallenge` have been made
public
- fixed enumer on `SessionFactorType`
- Adds a `JSON` type to the repository package to easy can JSON columns,
resp. jsonb object inside a property of a `JSONArray` object.
- Adds a `NoChange` interface, which can be implemented to signal that a
`Change` interface implementation is not writing any changes to the
statement builder, e.g. `CTEChange`
# Additional Changes
- Fixes the operators enums. `TextOperations` had wrong comments and
`NumberOperations` additionally also had from comparisons.
- Fixes downgrade of migration step 008.
# Additional Context
- closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10212
# Which Problems Are Solved
Flaky integration tests related to authorizations RT.
# How the Problems Are Solved
By setting the `created_at` and `updated_at` timestamps based on event
timestamps while creating an authorization.
# Additional Changes
N/A
# Additional Context
https://cloud.nx.app/runs/ICj84SxEf0/task/%40zitadel%2Fapi%3Atest-integration
# Which Problems Are Solved
This PR implements relational table and repository interface for the
authorizations feature as described in
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10767
# How the Problems Are Solved
By
* adding new `zitadel.authorizations` and `zitadel.authorization_roles`
tables
* implementing the `AuthorizationRepository` interface to create,
update, query, and delete user authorizations and roles
* implementing `authorization_relational.go` projection to update
`zitadel.authorizations` and `zitadel.authorization_roles` tables based
on events
# Additional Changes
N/A
# Additional Context
- Closes#10767
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
This PR implements the endpoints listed in
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10444 .
# How the Problems Are Solved
The implementation follows the same pattern as the Instance one. The
`Add` and `Remove` are implementing the `Commander` interface, while
`List` Domains endpoints are implementing the `Querier` interace.
The PR adds also some forgotten calls to the relational logic for the
Instance API. The commits are identifiable by the label `instance:`
prepended to them. This is the complete list: bafce01b0 , 6fe7257ab ,
e27bc9c34 , 8133ede73 , fde667953 , a3e1135ed , ee1a6f9c1
# Additional Context
- Closes#10444
---------
Co-authored-by: Elio Bischof <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lebogang Phoshoko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Wim Van Laer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Max Peintner <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gayathri Vijayan <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
The `SecretGenerators` setting is missing among the instance settings in
the new relational model.
# How the Problems Are Solved
This PR adds:
* `SettingTypeSecretGenerator` type to the settings model
* `SecretGeneratorSettingsRepository` and
`secretGeneratorSettingsJSONChanges` interfaces to set, retrieve, and
delete `secret_generator` settings, and corresponding unit tests.
* projection reducers to reduce the following events:
* `SecretGeneratorAddedEvent`
* `SecretGeneratorChangedEvent`
* `SecretGeneratorRemovedEvent`
* integration tests to test that the events get reduced correctly
# Additional Changes
N/A
# Additional Context
- Part of https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10207
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
`IS NULL` and `IS NOT NULL` conditions were incorrectly marked as
restricting columns,
and currently fails unit tests. The restricting columns are mostly used
to ensure single row selection during DELETE and UPDATE . When a `IS NOT
NULL` condition is passed, the filter may (unintentionally) apply to all
rows, while still allowing the query to execute.
Settings and other repositories (still to be done) have unified tables
for instance-level settings and organization-level settings. In those
cases the organization ID may be null or have a value. The unique
condition is a compound of multiple columns, in which case `IS NULL` is
valid as part of the other restricting columns.
# How the Problems Are Solved
In order to prevent unsafe usage of null related filters and not break
settings:
- null conditions are no longer considered restricting columns
- A function to force the restricting column state on a condition is
provided
- The settings unique condition function forces restricting column state
on the returned condition.
# Additional Changes
- add `backend/v3` to the NX build.
# Additional Context
- [pipeline
failures](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/actions/runs/19852295780/job/56881654340?pr=11115#step:13:3197)
---------
Co-authored-by: Elio Bischof <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
As part of https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/9599 to push to
move to a relational db table model, this is the migration of the
settings
# Additional Changes
I had to add 2 non source code files
`backend/v3/storage/database/events_testing/font.otf` and
`backend/v3/storage/database/events_testing/picture.png`, these are used
as part of the reduce tests, hence why they're sourced inside
`backend/v3/storage/database/events_testing/settings_instance_test.go`
- Closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10207
---------
Co-authored-by: adlerhurst <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tim Möhlmann <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <[email protected]>
This pull request introduces a new set of domain models and repositories
for managing users within the new v3 structure. The goal is to establish
a clean, robust, and extensible foundation for user management.
### Summary
This PR accomplishes the following:
- **Polymorphic User Model**: Introduces a `User` model in user.go that
can represent either a `Human` or a `Machine` user. This provides a
unified way to handle different user types while allowing for specific
attributes and logic for each.
- **Repository Pattern**: Implements the repository pattern for
accessing and manipulating user data. This decouples the business logic
from the data storage implementation. The main repository interfaces
(`UserRepository`, `HumanUserRepository`, `MachineUserRepository`) are
now defined in `backend/v3/domain/user_repository.go`.
- **Comprehensive User Models**: The user.go file now also defines the
domain models for associated user data, including `UserMetadata`,
`IdentityProviderLink`, `Passkey`, `PersonalAccessToken`, and
`MachineKey`.
- **Generic Verification and Check System**: Introduces verification.go
and check.go to provide a standardized way of handling various
verification flows (e.g., email verification, OTP checks).
- **Generated Code**: Adds new generated files for enums
(`humangender_enumer.go`, `machinekeytype_enumer.go`,
`passkeytype_enumer.go`, `personalaccesstokentype_enumer.go`,
`userstate_enumer.go`, `usertype_enumer.go`) and mocks for the new
repositories.
- **Session Domain Refactoring**: Updates the session domain
(`backend/v3/domain/session*.go`) to align with the new user model
structure.
This foundational work paves the way for migrating user management logic
to the new `v3` backend, with a more maintainable and testable
architecture.
part of #10224
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
This pull request introduces a new feature that allows adding, updating,
and querying project grants The changes are primarily in the backend and
include new database tables, repositories, and domain logic to support
project grants.
## Changes
* New `project_grants` table: A new table `zitadel.project_grants` is
introduced to store project grants It includes columns for
`instance_id`, `id`, `state`, `project_id`, `granted_org_id` and
`granting_org_id`.
* New `ProjectGrantRepository`: A new repository
`ProjectGrantRepository` is created to handle all database operations
for project grants. It provides methods to `Get`, `List`, `Create`,
`Update`, and `Delete`.
* New `project_grant_roles` table: A new table
`zitadel.project_grant_roles` is introduced to store project grant roles
It includes columns for `instance_id`, `grant_id`, `key`, `project_id`
and `project_org_id`.
* New `ProjectGrantRoleRepository`: A new repository
`ProjectGrantRoleRepository` is created to handle all database
operations for project grant roles. It provides methods to `Get`,
`List`, `Add`, and `Delete`.
* New `project_grant_relational_projection`: A new projection
`project_grant_relational_projection` is added to update the
`zitadel.project_grants` and `zitadel.project_grant_roles` tables based
on events. It handles all project grant events.
* Updated `ProjectRepository`: The `ProjectRepository` is updated to
list granted projects.
# Additional Context
Closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10766
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Silvan <[email protected]>
This pull request refactors the command execution and transaction
handling logic within the `domain` package. The primary goal is to
simplify the invoker chain, clarify transaction management, and improve
the overall structure for better maintainability and readability.
### Key Changes:
- **Simplified Invoker Chain**: The previous chain of invokers has been
refactored. A new `transactionInvoker` is introduced to explicitly
manage database transactions for commands that require them. This
responsibility is no longer spread across different parts of the
invocation flow.
- **`Transactional` Interface**: A new `Transactional` interface has
been introduced. Commands that need to run within a database transaction
now implement this interface. This provides a clear and explicit
contract for transactional operations.
- **Consolidated Transaction Logic**: The logic for starting,
committing, and rolling back transactions is now centralized within the
`transactionInvoker` and the `eventStoreInvoker`. The `EnsureTx` method
on `InvokeOpts` has been removed, and transaction handling is now
managed automatically by the invocation framework.
- **Improved Event Handling**: The `eventStoreInvoker` and its
`eventCollector` have been rewritten to be more robust and to correctly
handle nested and batched commands, ensuring that all events are
collected and published within the same transaction.
- **Code Cleanup**: A significant amount of now-unused code, including
the old `invoker_test.go`, has been removed. Various comments and
variable declarations have also been cleaned up.
- **Updated Command Implementations**: All commands in the `domain`
package (e.g., `ActivateOrgCommand`, `DeactivateOrgCommand`,
`DeleteOrgCommand`, `UpdateOrgCommand`) have been updated to use the new
`Transactional` interface where appropriate, removing manual transaction
management.
- **Enhanced Testing**: Tests have been added and updated to cover the
new transaction and event handling logic, ensuring the refactoring is
sound.
- **Use `PrimaryKeyCondition`**: Use the
`repository.PrimaryKeyCondition(...)` method instead of using
`database.And(...)` where possible.
These changes lead to a cleaner, more decoupled architecture for command
handling in ZITADEL.
---------
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Relational table's primary keys are part of the SQL table definition.
However, by abstraction through the repository interfaces callers
(service layer) have no clear understanding of the primary key definion.
This might lead to confusion during implementation:
- The repository makes a sanity check on required conditions before
query execution and returns an error if the condition was not met.
- When a Get method is executed, an error is returned if not exactly one
row is found. Get replaces the legacy GetXxxByID methods we have on
projections. However, a list of flexible conditions can be passed.
- Operations like UPDATE and DELETE should often only affect a single
row, identified by the primary key. If the primary key conditions are
missing an error is returned.
Because there is no "type safety" enforced here, the errors are returned
during runtime. When all possible combinations of API arguments are not
properly tested such errors are actually bugs in the experience of the
end-user. (The API should do it's own input validation, but a
programmer's error is easily made).
# How the Problems Are Solved
Add `PrimaryKeyColumns` and `PrimaryKeyCondition` to existing repository
intefaces.
# Additional Changes
- Where reducers already used repositories, the PrimaryKeyConditions are
used where possible.
# Additional Context
- Part of
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/wiki/Decision-Log#expose-primary-key-definition-in-repository-interfaces
---------
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
This pull request introduces a new feature that allows adding, updating,
and querying metadata for organizations. The changes are primarily in
the backend and include new database tables, repositories, and domain
logic to support organization metadata.
## Changes
* New `org_metadata` table: A new table `zitadel.org_metadata` is
introduced to store metadata for organizations. It includes columns for
`instance_id`, `org_id`, `key`, and `value`. The `value` is stored as a
`BYTEA` type to allow for flexible data storage.
* New `OrganizationMetadataRepository`: A new repository
`OrganizationMetadataRepository` is created to handle all database
operations for organization metadata. It provides methods to `Get`,
`List`, `Set`, and `Remove` metadata.
* New `org_metadata_relational_projection`: A new projection
`org_metadata_relational_projection` is added to update the
`zitadel.org_metadata` table based on events. It handles `MetadataSet`,
`MetadataRemoved`, and `MetadataRemovedAll` events.
* Updated `OrganizationRepository`: The `OrganizationRepository` is
updated to support loading organization metadata. A new method
`LoadMetadata` is added to enable joining the `org_metadata` table when
querying for organizations.
* Updated Organization domain: The Organization domain model is updated
to include a new field `Metadata` of type `[]*OrganizationMetadata`.
## Additional Info
* Extensible Design: The new metadata feature is designed to be
extensible, allowing for future enhancements such as indexing on
specific JSON fields within the `value` column.
* closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10206
* closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10214
# Which Problems Are Solved
Add projects to the relational tables
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Define table migrations
- Define and implement Project and Project Role repositories.
- Provide projection handlers to populate the relational tables.
# Additional Changes
- Statement Builder now has a constructor which allows setting of a base
query with arguments.
- Certain operations, like Get, Update and Delete require the Primary
Key to be set as conditions. However, this requires knowledge of the
implementation and table definition. This PR proposes an additional
condition for repositories: `PrimaryKeyCondition`. This gives clarity on
the required IDs for these operations.
- Added couple of helpers to the repository package, to allow more DRY
code.
- getOne / getMany: generic functions for query execution and scanning.
- checkRestrictingColumns, checkPkCondition: simplify condition
checking, instead of using ladders of conditionals.
- Added a couple of helpers to the repository test package:
- Transaction, savepoint and rollback helpers.
- Create instance and organization helpers for objects that depend on
them (like projects).
# Additional Context
- after https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/10809
- closes#10765
This pull request introduces a significant refactoring of the database
interaction layer, focusing on improving explicitness, transactional
control, and error handling. The core change is the removal of the
stateful `QueryExecutor` from repository instances. Instead, it is now
passed as an argument to each method that interacts with the database.
This change makes transaction management more explicit and flexible, as
the same repository instance can be used with a database pool or a
specific transaction without needing to be re-instantiated.
### Key Changes
- **Explicit `QueryExecutor` Passing:**
- All repository methods (`Get`, `List`, `Create`, `Update`, `Delete`,
etc.) in `InstanceRepository`, `OrganizationRepository`,
`UserRepository`, and their sub-repositories now require a
`database.QueryExecutor` (e.g., a `*pgxpool.Pool` or `pgx.Tx`) as the
first argument.
- Repository constructors no longer accept a `QueryExecutor`. For
example, `repository.InstanceRepository(pool)` is now
`repository.InstanceRepository()`.
- **Enhanced Error Handling:**
- A new `database.MissingConditionError` is introduced to enforce
required query conditions, such as ensuring an `instance_id` is always
present in `UPDATE` and `DELETE` operations.
- The database error wrapper in the `postgres` package now correctly
identifies and wraps `pgx.ErrTooManyRows` and similar errors from the
`scany` library into a `database.MultipleRowsFoundError`.
- **Improved Database Conditions:**
- The `database.Condition` interface now includes a
`ContainsColumn(Column) bool` method. This allows for runtime checks to
ensure that critical filters (like `instance_id`) are included in a
query, preventing accidental cross-tenant data modification.
- A new `database.Exists()` condition has been added to support `EXISTS`
subqueries, enabling more complex filtering logic, such as finding an
organization that has a specific domain.
- **Repository and Interface Refactoring:**
- The method for loading related entities (e.g., domains for an
organization) has been changed from a boolean flag (`Domains(true)`) to
a more explicit, chainable method (`LoadDomains()`). This returns a new
repository instance configured to load the sub-resource, promoting
immutability.
- The custom `OrgIdentifierCondition` has been removed in favor of using
the standard `database.Condition` interface, simplifying the API.
- **Code Cleanup and Test Updates:**
- Unnecessary struct embeddings and metadata have been removed.
- All integration and repository tests have been updated to reflect the
new method signatures, passing the database pool or transaction object
explicitly.
- New tests have been added to cover the new `ExistsDomain`
functionality and other enhancements.
These changes make the data access layer more robust, predictable, and
easier to work with, especially in the context of database transactions.
This pull request fixes an issue where the repository would fail to scan
organization or instance structs if the `domains` column was `NULL`.
## Which problems are solved
If the `domains` column of `orgs` or `instances` was `NULL`, the
repository failed scanning into the structs. This happened because the
scanning mechanism did not correctly handle `NULL` JSONB columns.
## How the problems are solved
A new generic type `JSONArray[T]` is introduced, which implements the
`sql.Scanner` interface. This type can correctly scan JSON arrays from
the database, including handling `NULL` values gracefully.
The repositories for instances and organizations have been updated to
use this new type for the domains field. The SQL queries have also been
improved to use `FILTER` with `jsonb_agg` for better readability and
performance when aggregating domains.
## Additional changes
* An unnecessary cleanup step in the organization domain tests for
already removed domains has been removed.
* The `pgxscan` library has been replaced with `sqlscan` for scanning
`database/sql`.Rows.
* Minor cleanups in integration tests.
This PR initiates the rework of Zitadel's backend to state-persisted
objects. This change is a step towards a more scalable and maintainable
architecture.
## Changes
* **New `/backend/v3` package**: A new package structure has been
introduced to house the reworked backend logic. This includes:
* `domain`: Contains the core business logic, commands, and repository
interfaces.
* `storage`: Implements the repository interfaces for database
interactions with new transactional tables.
* `telemetry`: Provides logging and tracing capabilities.
* **Transactional Tables**: New database tables have been defined for
`instances`, `instance_domains`, `organizations`, and `org_domains`.
* **Projections**: New projections have been created to populate the new
relational tables from the existing event store, ensuring data
consistency during the migration.
* **Repositories**: New repositories provide an abstraction layer for
accessing and manipulating the data in the new tables.
* **Setup**: A new setup step for `TransactionalTables` has been added
to manage the database migrations for the new tables.
This PR lays the foundation for future work to fully transition to
state-persisted objects for these components, which will improve
performance and simplify data access patterns.
This PR initiates the rework of ZITADEL's backend to state-persisted
objects. This is a foundational step towards a new architecture that
will improve performance and maintainability.
The following objects are migrated from event-sourced aggregates to
state-persisted objects:
* Instances
* incl. Domains
* Orgs
* incl. Domains
The structure of the new backend implementation follows the software
architecture defined in this [wiki
page](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/wiki/Software-Architecturel).
This PR includes:
* The initial implementation of the new transactional repositories for
the objects listed above.
* Projections to populate the new relational tables from the existing
event store.
* Adjustments to the build and test process to accommodate the new
backend structure.
This is a work in progress and further changes will be made to complete
the migration.
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Iraq Jaber <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Iraq <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tim Möhlmann <[email protected]>
Gayathri VijayanandGitHub
