# Which Problems Are Solved
The payload in actions V2 is currently sent as JSON to the target
endpoint. It might get exposed to intermediary infrastructure or logging
systems.
For these scenarios there needs to be an application-layer encryption,
where the provider of the endpoint can define an key to be used for the
encryption.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Added an additional option to the target to specify the payload type:
`JSON` (current and default), `JWT`, `JWE` (api and console)
- added endpoints to upload and manage public keys (to be used for
encryption) for a target
- updated all action v2 executions (interceptors, oidc, saml, ...) to
provide the `GetActiveSigningWebKey` from queries
- implemented jwt and jwe in the exections incl. refactoring of code and
tests
- changes to the authn_keys table:
- added a `fingerprint` column
- dropped not null constraint on expiration
- moved the `GetSignerOnce` into its own package to prevent circular
dependencies
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
closes#11061
---------
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: conblem <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Silvan <[email protected]>
<!--
Please inform yourself about the contribution guidelines on submitting a
PR here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#submit-a-pull-request-pr.
Take note of how PR/commit titles should be written and replace the
template texts in the sections below. Don't remove any of the sections.
It is important that the commit history clearly shows what is changed
and why.
Important: By submitting a contribution you agree to the terms from our
Licensing Policy as described here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/LICENSING.md#community-contributions.
-->
One-time recovery codes are a common multi-factor authentication (MFA)
backup method, letting users access their account if they lose other MFA
devices. Support for recovery codes can also reduce support burden for
users locked out of their accounts and provide a more secure and
reliable form of verification than security questions.
# Which Problems Are Solved
Zitadel currently lacks support for recovery codes.
# How the Problems Are Solved
This PR partially addresses recovery code support in Zitadel.
Importantly, it adds recovery codes as a new 2FA `Factor` and an
additional `Check` type for the Session API.
```
Example recovery code flow:
1. User generates N new recovery codes using `POST /v2/users/{user_id}/recovery_codes`
2. Zitadel hashes and stores these codes and returns the un-hashed codes in the response
3. User creates new session with an additional check: `recoveryCode`
4. Code is checked against hash and, if valid, cannot be used again
5. User attempts to adds N more codes using the same endpoint
6. If `remaining_codes + N <= RecoveryCodes->MaxCount` config value, then recovery codes are added in addition to original codes
7. User can remove all recovery codes using `DEL /v2/users/:userId/recovery_codes`
```
This PR adds:
- [x] Session recovery_code check support on `POST+PATCH /v2/sessions`
endpoints
- [x] Adds `mfa_recovery_code_checked_at` column (default null) to
`projections.sessions8` table
- [x] Support for `SECOND_FACTOR_TYPE_RECOVERY_CODES` as available 2FA
method on login policy
- [x] Support for importing recovery codes in /import code
Missing, will _not_ implement in this PR:
- [ ] Admin console support for displaying Recovery Code settings for
user(s)
- [ ] Zitadel Typescript login support for recovery codes
TODO:
- [x] Additional unit and integration tests
- [x] Error translations
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
- Closes#6898
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
When adding 2 orgs with the same ID, you get a positive response from
the API, later when the org is projected, it errors due to the id
already in use
# How the Problems Are Solved
Check org with orgID specified does not already exist before adding
events
# Additional Changes
Added additional test case for adding same org with same name twice
# Additional Context
- Closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10127
---------
Co-authored-by: Silvan <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
The commands for the resource based v2beta AuthorizationService API are
added.
Authorizations, previously knows as user grants, give a user in a
specific organization and project context roles.
The project can be owned or granted.
The given roles can be used to restrict access within the projects
applications.
The commands for the resource based v2beta InteralPermissionService API
are added.
Administrators, previously knows as memberships, give a user in a
specific organization and project context roles.
The project can be owned or granted.
The give roles give the user permissions to manage different resources
in Zitadel.
API definitions from https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/9165 are
implemented.
Contains endpoints for user metadata.
# How the Problems Are Solved
### New Methods
- CreateAuthorization
- UpdateAuthorization
- DeleteAuthorization
- ActivateAuthorization
- DeactivateAuthorization
- ListAuthorizations
- CreateAdministrator
- UpdateAdministrator
- DeleteAdministrator
- ListAdministrators
- SetUserMetadata to set metadata on a user
- DeleteUserMetadata to delete metadata on a user
- ListUserMetadata to query for metadata of a user
## Deprecated Methods
### v1.ManagementService
- GetUserGrantByID
- ListUserGrants
- AddUserGrant
- UpdateUserGrant
- DeactivateUserGrant
- ReactivateUserGrant
- RemoveUserGrant
- BulkRemoveUserGrant
### v1.AuthService
- ListMyUserGrants
- ListMyProjectPermissions
# Additional Changes
- Permission checks for metadata functionality on query and command side
- correct existence checks for resources, for example you can only be an
administrator on an existing project
- combined all member tables to singular query for the administrators
- add permission checks for command an query side functionality
- combined functions on command side where necessary for easier
maintainability
# Additional Context
Closes#9165
---------
Co-authored-by: Elio Bischof <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
This pull request addresses a significant gap in the user service v2
API, which currently lacks methods for managing machine users.
# How the Problems Are Solved
This PR adds new API endpoints to the user service v2 to manage machine
users including their secret, keys and personal access tokens.
Additionally, there's now a CreateUser and UpdateUser endpoints which
allow to create either a human or machine user and update them. The
existing `CreateHumanUser` endpoint has been deprecated along the
corresponding management service endpoints. For details check the
additional context section.
# Additional Context
- Closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/9349
## More details
- API changes: https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/9680
- Implementation: https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/9763
- Tests: https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/9771
## Follow-ups
- Metadata: support managing user metadata using resource API
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/10005
- Machine token type: support managing the machine token type (migrate
to new enum with zero value unspecified?)
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
The OAuth2 Device Authorization Grant could not yet been handled through
the new login UI, resp. using the session API.
This PR adds the ability for the login UI to get the required
information to display the user and handle their decision (approve with
authorization or deny) using the OIDC Service API.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Added a `GetDeviceAuthorizationRequest` endpoint, which allows getting
the `id`, `client_id`, `scope`, `app_name` and `project_name` of the
device authorization request
- Added a `AuthorizeOrDenyDeviceAuthorization` endpoint, which allows to
approve/authorize with the session information or deny the request. The
identification of the request is done by the `device_authorization_id` /
`id` returned in the previous request.
- To prevent leaking the `device_code` to the UI, but still having an
easy reference, it's encrypted and returned as `id`, resp. decrypted
when used.
- Fixed returned error types for device token responses on token
endpoint:
- Explicitly return `access_denied` (without internal error) when user
denied the request
- Default to `invalid_grant` instead of `access_denied`
- Explicitly check on initial state when approving the reqeust
- Properly handle done case (also relates to initial check)
- Documented the flow and handling in custom UIs (according to OIDC /
SAML)
# Additional Changes
- fixed some typos and punctuation in the corresponding OIDC / SAML
guides.
- added some missing translations for auth and saml request
# Additional Context
- closes#6239
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Möhlmann <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
It is currently not possible to use SAML with the Session API.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Add SAML service, to get and resolve SAML requests.
Add SAML session and SAML request aggregate, which can be linked to the
Session to get back a SAMLResponse from the API directly.
# Additional Changes
Update of dependency zitadel/saml to provide all functionality for
handling of SAML requests and responses.
# Additional Context
Closes#6053
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
As an administrator I want to be able to invite users to my application
with the API V2, some user data I will already prefil, the user should
add the authentication method themself (password, passkey, sso).
# How the Problems Are Solved
- A user can now be created with a email explicitly set to false.
- If a user has no verified email and no authentication method, an
`InviteCode` can be created through the User V2 API.
- the code can be returned or sent through email
- additionally `URLTemplate` and an `ApplicatioName` can provided for
the email
- The code can be resent and verified through the User V2 API
- The V1 login allows users to verify and resend the code and set a
password (analog user initialization)
- The message text for the user invitation can be customized
# Additional Changes
- `verifyUserPasskeyCode` directly uses `crypto.VerifyCode` (instead of
`verifyEncryptedCode`)
- `verifyEncryptedCode` is removed (unnecessarily queried for the code
generator)
# Additional Context
- closes#8310
- TODO: login V2 will have to implement invite flow:
https://github.com/zitadel/typescript/issues/166
