# Which Problems Are Solved
ZITADEL cannot currently be used as an OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server by
clients that need to register themselves at runtime:
- There is no [OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration (RFC
7591)](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7591) endpoint, and no
`registration_endpoint` is advertised in the discovery document.
- This blocks [Model Context Protocol
(MCP)](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) clients (Claude Desktop,
claude.ai, Cursor, the MCP SDKs), whose OAuth 2.1 authorization profile
expects an Authorization Server that supports dynamic client
registration. They self-register before any user context exists and only
then start the authorization code + PKCE flow.
# How the Problems Are Solved
## Control plane: instance security settings
No feature flag and no runtime config. A
`DynamicClientRegistrationSettings` message is nested under the instance
`SecuritySettings` in `settings/v2`, next to `embedded_iframe` and
`enable_impersonation`:
| `enabled` | `allow_unauthenticated` | Behaviour |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `false` (default) | — | `POST /oauth/v2/register` returns `404`,
`registration_endpoint` absent from discovery |
| `true` | `false` (default) | Token-gated registration, client homed in
the token's organization |
| `true` | `true` | Open registration for MCP hosts, client homed in the
instance default organization |
Both values are carried on `authz.Instance` and loaded with the
instance, exactly like `EnableImpersonation`, so the discovery document
and the endpoint read them per request without an extra query.
`allow_unauthenticated` implies `enabled` in both implementations, so a
single setting closes the endpoint.
Adding the two columns bumps the projection table to
`projections.security_policies3`, following what the impersonation
setting did for `security_policies2`.
## Authorization: a dedicated permission, not `project.app.write`
- New org-scoped permission **`project.app.register_dynamic`**, granted
by default to `ORG_OWNER`, `IAM_OWNER` and `IAM_ORG_MANAGER` — in both
`InternalAuthZ` and `SystemAuthZ`, mirroring where `project.app.write`
already lives.
- New built-in role **`ORG_DYNAMIC_CLIENT_REGISTRAR`** carrying only
that permission, so a service user can self-register clients without
gaining write access to the organization's existing applications.
- Open mode (`allow_unauthenticated = true`) requires no token and no
permission: that is the MCP self-register path.
- A valid token whose user lacks the permission is answered with **`403
insufficient_scope`** (RFC 6750 §3.1) rather than `401 invalid_token`,
so a caller can tell "your token is bad" from "your token may not do
this". `verifyAccessToken` also reports invalid tokens as permission
denied, so the authorization failure is marked explicitly to keep the
two apart.
The check runs once, at the endpoint, right after the token is verified
and before any state is created, so it also gates the auto-provisioning
of the organization's DCR project. The permission itself lives in the
command layer next to the others
(`Commands.CheckPermissionRegisterDynamicClient`). As the OIDC endpoints
are not behind the authorization interceptor, the caller identity is
derived from the verified token, the way token exchange does for the
impersonating actor.
## Registration itself
- **Registered clients are ordinary OIDC applications.** The endpoint
reuses the existing application-creation events
(`NewApplicationAddedEvent` and `NewOIDCConfigAddedEvent`), so the whole
token, authorization and introspection flow keeps working unchanged.
They are stored in a dedicated, auto-provisioned project named `ZITADEL
DCR` per organization (name lookup), so they do not pollute the
`IAMProject` or other projects.
- Input is validated with the existing `GetOIDCV1Compliance` rules;
`private_key_jwt` and `jwks`/`jwks_uri` are rejected with
`invalid_client_metadata`.
- **Endpoint wiring without forking the library.** `NewServer` calls
`op.RegisterServer` instead of `op.RegisterLegacyServer`, so the new
route can be added through the same `op.WithSetRouter` hook as the
authorize callback. `op.RegisterLegacyServer` appends a middleware after
the caller options, which chi forbids once a route has been registered;
`op.NewIssuerInterceptor` reproduces the issuer middleware it would
otherwise add. The `/oauth/v2` routing prefix is unchanged.
# Additional Changes
- **`application_type` inference for custom-scheme redirects** (last
commit, isolated). `application_type` is an OpenID Connect member; RFC
7591 does not define it, so clients that only implement RFC 7591 omit
it. Native MCP hosts doing so register custom-scheme redirect URIs,
which ZITADEL reserves for native applications, and the OIDC default of
`web` rejected them with `invalid_redirect_uri`. Inference is limited to
custom schemes and to an absent `application_type`, so every request
accepted today keeps its current application type and auth method — an
`http` loopback redirect still yields a web application. Happy to drop
this commit if you would rather keep it out of this PR.
- **Docs**: a Dynamic Client Registration integration guide, a
`registration_endpoint` section on the OpenID Connect endpoints page,
and the new role in the administrators table (plus its description in
the Console translations).
# Additional Context
- Part of #9810. This is **Phase 1 (DCR)**; #12315 adds RFC 7592 and
#12316 adds CIMD, both stacked on this branch and rebased once this
lands.
- Implements the control-plane and authorization model requested in the
review of this PR, itself a refinement of the direction in
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/9810#issuecomment-4891176997.
- **Out of scope (deliberately)**: RFC 7592, CIMD, persisting free-form
metadata (`logo_uri`, `contacts`, and similar), and `private_key_jwt` /
`jwks_uri` (rejected cleanly). No new event types.
- Follow-ups explicitly left out, per the review: DCR client lifecycle
and richer audit, consent and custom scopes, JWT / `aud` (RFC 8707), and
RFC 8414 AS metadata (currently absent from both ZITADEL and
`zitadel/oidc`).
# Which Problems Are Solved
This PR introduces the possibility of using the relational DB when
calling the ListSession gRPC endpoint.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Implement the Querier interface for ListSession:
- Create a `domain` model for the Session object to be able to map the
gRPC session into it.
- Match the permission filters on ES side to be sure the same sessions
are returned
- Implement converter methods to go from `gRPC` to `domain` models (both
ways)
- Fix the session sql relational migration: rework the trigger to update
the `expiration` field to perform the update only when the input
`lifetime` has a non-zero value.
- Link the Querier implementation with the gRPC endpoint
- Run the same integration tests against the relational DB, making sure
the outcome is the same. ⚠️ Due to missing permission checks, some
divergence is expected. Hence, specific code to circumvent the
differences has been put in place
# Additional Context
- Closes#11039
This update introduces a new table for managing administrator role
permissions, along with the necessary repository and projection logic to
handle adding and removing permissions. It also includes tests to ensure
the correct functionality of the permission management system.
closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10219
---------
Co-authored-by: Marco Ardizzone <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
`@zitadel/api:generate-go` failed due to duplicate generated files.
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/11820 removed the old generated
file and added a generate command to the `internal/crypto/crypto.go`
file. However, there was already a `internal/crypto/generate.go` with a
different output file name (the old file).
# How the Problems Are Solved
Removed the `internal/crypto/generate.go` file and moved the second
generate into `internal/crypto/code.go`.
# Additional Changes
Noticed that mockgen is an old version and updated it. Also then checked
all other tools and updated them.
# Additional Context
- relates to #11820
- noted internally
# Which Problems Are Solved
As part of #11035 , this PR implements the Passkey check logic for
session validation
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Refactor webauth FinishLogin to support new domain model
- Add webauth config to defaults
- Implement passkey check logic and tests
- Manual transaction management to avoid stalling the DB while
FinishLogin callback is executed
- Update passkey Type condition to allow passing a text operation
(equal, contains, etc..)
# Additional Context
This is a cherry-picked PR + minor changes, coming from
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/11164
- Relates to #11035
---------
Co-authored-by: Fabienne Bühler <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gayathri Vijayan <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
This PR adds the OTP SMS Challenge needed for CreateSession API
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/11035
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Introduce `OTPSMSChallengeCommand` (validate/execute/events) for
session creation checks
- Introduce `GetOTPCryptoGeneratorConfigWithDefault` to fetch
per-instance secret generator settings
- Add unit tests
# Additional Changes
Refactor tests in `session_check_recovery_code_test.go` to make the
helper functions reusable in `session_challenge_otp_sms_test.go`
# Additional Context
Related to https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/11035
# Which Problems Are Solved
As part of moving the session API to the relational database, this PR
adds the functionality to delete sessions through the session API v2 and
the OIDC end_session endpoint.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- added `SessionDeleteCommand` in domain package
- added possibility to pass the session token verifier to the domain
package
- use feature flag to switch API and OIDC usage from CQRS to relation
table
- added a `permissionCheck` condition to let permissions be checked
directly in the repository / sql
- part of it is still a placeholder until actual permission tables are
done
- added a `session_deleted` table to store (recently) deleted sessions
to handle necessary checks / cases like delete my own session, which
needs to be idempotent
# Additional Changes
Fixed `Matches` function of `existsCondition` (as missing an
implementation)
# Additional Context
- closes#11037
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <[email protected]>
Introduces the `administrators` relational table and repository layer
for the v3 backend, unifying instance, organization, project, and
project-grant membership into a single scoped model.
Closes#10220
## Changes
- **Domain**: `Administrator` struct, `AdministratorScope` enum,
`AdministratorRepository` interface with typed CRUD, column, condition,
and change helpers. Generated enumer and GoMock.
- **Migration** (`016`): `zitadel.administrators` table with a generated
`id`, scope-alignment check constraint, cascading foreign keys, and a
child `administrator_roles` table.
- **Repository**: CTE-based role mutations (`AddRole`, `RemoveRole`,
`SetRoles`) for atomicity. Roles aggregated via `ARRAY_AGG`.
- **Projection**: Event reducers for
`member.added/changed/removed/cascade_removed` across all four admin
scopes.
- **Fixes**: `Rows.Close()` error wrapping; `TextArray` nil-safe scan +
full `pgtype` array interface; `authorization` and `projectGrant` scan
helpers fixed for `ARRAY_AGG` under `database/sql`; removed unused `ctx`
parameter from `callReduce`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Marco Ardizzone <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
As part of #11035 , this PR implements the IDP intent check logic for
session validation
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Inject encryption algorithm for IDP intent tokens at DB initialization
- Add the IDP intent repository as an invoke option
- Rework crypto mocks using gomock
- Implement IDP intent check logic
- minor - DB: expand IDP Intent deletion testing table with a test case
where IDP intent is not found
# Noteworthy
I did not implement `domain.Transactional` given the doubts that
@adlerhurst expressed in https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/11804 .
So, there is no transaction AT ALL in here because the `Execute()`
method contains one single DB call (Delete) and `Validate()` just does
Get calls.
# Additional Context
This is a cherry-picked PR + minor changes, coming from
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/11164
- Relates to #11035
- Depends on https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/11804
# Which Problems Are Solved
As part of #11035 , this PR implements the password check logic for
session validation
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Add system config to default configuration of `domain` package for
easy initialization. Intialize the system settings when Zitadel starts
up
- Add password hasher verify logic to the default configuration of
`domain` package. Initialize it when Zitadel starts up.
- Add settings repositories with their mocks
- Implement the logic for doing a password check
# Additional Context
This is a cherry-picked PR + minor changes, coming from
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/11164
- Relates to #11035
- Depends on https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/11777
# Which Problems Are Solved
As part of #11035 , this PR implements the user check logic for session
validation
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Add user and session repositories as invoke options, as well as their
mocks to prepare the ground for testing
- Implement the logic for the UserCheck command, following what has been
done on eventstore side
- Add a session permission chek interface to be used during the
`Validate()` part of the Commander
# Additional Context
This is a cherry-picked PR + minor changes, coming from
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/11164
- Relates to #11035
---------
Co-authored-by: Silvan <[email protected]>
Introduce a new SQL migration that creates the `login_names` table and
associated triggers/functions for managing login names based on domain
policies and user updates. Manual tests confirm the functionality works
as intended.
## Summary
This PR introduces the relational user repository for backend v3,
including schema, repository APIs, reducers/projections, and tests for
both human and machine users.
## What changed
* Added user-focused relational migrations (users, verifications,
metadata, PATs, machine keys, passkeys, identity provider links) and
related FK wiring.
* Implemented/expanded repository domain contracts and storage
implementations for human and machine user flows.
* Added support for machine secret handling and aligned access token
type modeling.
* Extended user domain models (verifications, password/email/phone/TOTP
state, passkeys, metadata, invite handling, identity provider links).
* Updated projection/reduction coverage and integration tests for key
user lifecycle events.
* Regenerated and updated mocks/enums plus supporting database
change/column utilities.
## Notes for reviewers
* This PR is large because it establishes the foundational relational
user storage layer and related test scaffolding. Sorry for that.
## Closes
Closes#10218Closes#10224Closes#10225Closes#10209Closes#10802
---------
Co-authored-by: Iraq Jaber <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tim Möhlmann <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
In the context of moving our datastore to relational tables, Identity
Provider Intents have no definition of a relational table nor any DB API
that can be used to store the IDP intents as relational objects.
# How the Problems Are Solved
The PR follows the guidelines left in #11190
- A table `zitadel.identity_provider_intents` is created: it defines its
relational constraints (foreign keys) with the other tables, as well as
an ENUM to represent the state of the intent.
- An IDP Intent repository has been created, which offers CRUD
operations implemented as `Create`, `Get`, `Update` and `Delete` methods
for the IDP intent.
- The repository also defines all columns and conditions useful for
performing DB operations on the IDP intents.
- DB mocks have been added as well to ease testing on the `domain`
package.
- Reduction functions have been implemented for the existing IDP events
so to keep the relational table in sync with the event store.
# Additional Changes
To allow testing LDAP intent flow, the `Session.FetchUser()` method has
been extracted to a separate file. A corresponding mock has been created
as well in `fetch_user_mock.go`. The files are mutually excluded and
added at build time through go build tags: the mock is added when the
`integration` tag is specified, while the real implementation is added
when the same tag IS NOT added to the build tags.
# Additional Context
- Closes#11190
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Silvan <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
The following terms have all been renamed to management console:
- Customer Portal (when used to mean the console)
- Console
- Admin Console
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Search & Replace smartly
- Use Copilot for translation files
Changes done to: backend + frontend codebase, docs, translations and
protobufs (descriptions only)
# Additional Context
- Partially Closes#11279
# Which Problems Are Solved
As part of going to a relation storage model, we need to implement the
repository for handling sessions and their events.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Adds a migration step to create the necessary tables and types in the
database.
- Adds the repository implementation for sessions.
- Implements a projection handler for session events to handle the
events written by the old command handlers.
- Updates the `Session` type and `SessionRepository` interface:
- added `CreatorID`
- Adjusted `Delete` method to return amount of affected columns
- Removed sub-repository clumns from the main interface
- Added `CreatorIDCondition`, `ExpirationCondition`, `ExistsFactor` and
`ExistsMetadata`
- Removed `SetUserAgent`
- Methods of `SessionFactor` and `SessionChallenge` have been made
public
- fixed enumer on `SessionFactorType`
- Adds a `JSON` type to the repository package to easy can JSON columns,
resp. jsonb object inside a property of a `JSONArray` object.
- Adds a `NoChange` interface, which can be implemented to signal that a
`Change` interface implementation is not writing any changes to the
statement builder, e.g. `CTEChange`
# Additional Changes
- Fixes the operators enums. `TextOperations` had wrong comments and
`NumberOperations` additionally also had from comparisons.
- Fixes downgrade of migration step 008.
# Additional Context
- closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10212
# Which Problems Are Solved
This PR implements relational table and repository interface for the
authorizations feature as described in
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10767
# How the Problems Are Solved
By
* adding new `zitadel.authorizations` and `zitadel.authorization_roles`
tables
* implementing the `AuthorizationRepository` interface to create,
update, query, and delete user authorizations and roles
* implementing `authorization_relational.go` projection to update
`zitadel.authorizations` and `zitadel.authorization_roles` tables based
on events
# Additional Changes
N/A
# Additional Context
- Closes#10767
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
This PR implements the endpoints listed in
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10444 .
# How the Problems Are Solved
The implementation follows the same pattern as the Instance one. The
`Add` and `Remove` are implementing the `Commander` interface, while
`List` Domains endpoints are implementing the `Querier` interace.
The PR adds also some forgotten calls to the relational logic for the
Instance API. The commits are identifiable by the label `instance:`
prepended to them. This is the complete list: bafce01b0 , 6fe7257ab ,
e27bc9c34 , 8133ede73 , fde667953 , a3e1135ed , ee1a6f9c1
# Additional Context
- Closes#10444
---------
Co-authored-by: Elio Bischof <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lebogang Phoshoko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Wim Van Laer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Max Peintner <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gayathri Vijayan <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
The `SecretGenerators` setting is missing among the instance settings in
the new relational model.
# How the Problems Are Solved
This PR adds:
* `SettingTypeSecretGenerator` type to the settings model
* `SecretGeneratorSettingsRepository` and
`secretGeneratorSettingsJSONChanges` interfaces to set, retrieve, and
delete `secret_generator` settings, and corresponding unit tests.
* projection reducers to reduce the following events:
* `SecretGeneratorAddedEvent`
* `SecretGeneratorChangedEvent`
* `SecretGeneratorRemovedEvent`
* integration tests to test that the events get reduced correctly
# Additional Changes
N/A
# Additional Context
- Part of https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10207
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
This pull request introduces a new set of domain models and repositories
for managing users within the new v3 structure. The goal is to establish
a clean, robust, and extensible foundation for user management.
### Summary
This PR accomplishes the following:
- **Polymorphic User Model**: Introduces a `User` model in user.go that
can represent either a `Human` or a `Machine` user. This provides a
unified way to handle different user types while allowing for specific
attributes and logic for each.
- **Repository Pattern**: Implements the repository pattern for
accessing and manipulating user data. This decouples the business logic
from the data storage implementation. The main repository interfaces
(`UserRepository`, `HumanUserRepository`, `MachineUserRepository`) are
now defined in `backend/v3/domain/user_repository.go`.
- **Comprehensive User Models**: The user.go file now also defines the
domain models for associated user data, including `UserMetadata`,
`IdentityProviderLink`, `Passkey`, `PersonalAccessToken`, and
`MachineKey`.
- **Generic Verification and Check System**: Introduces verification.go
and check.go to provide a standardized way of handling various
verification flows (e.g., email verification, OTP checks).
- **Generated Code**: Adds new generated files for enums
(`humangender_enumer.go`, `machinekeytype_enumer.go`,
`passkeytype_enumer.go`, `personalaccesstokentype_enumer.go`,
`userstate_enumer.go`, `usertype_enumer.go`) and mocks for the new
repositories.
- **Session Domain Refactoring**: Updates the session domain
(`backend/v3/domain/session*.go`) to align with the new user model
structure.
This foundational work paves the way for migrating user management logic
to the new `v3` backend, with a more maintainable and testable
architecture.
part of #10224
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
This PR implements the endpoints listed in
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10443 .
# How the Problems Are Solved
The implementation follows the same pattern as the Organization one.
There are no peculiarities to this PR. The `Update`, `Delete` are
implementing the `Commander` interface, while `Get` and `List`
instance(s) endpoints are implementing the `Querier` interace.
# Additional Context
- Closes#10443
- Depends on #10445
This pull request refactors the command execution and transaction
handling logic within the `domain` package. The primary goal is to
simplify the invoker chain, clarify transaction management, and improve
the overall structure for better maintainability and readability.
### Key Changes:
- **Simplified Invoker Chain**: The previous chain of invokers has been
refactored. A new `transactionInvoker` is introduced to explicitly
manage database transactions for commands that require them. This
responsibility is no longer spread across different parts of the
invocation flow.
- **`Transactional` Interface**: A new `Transactional` interface has
been introduced. Commands that need to run within a database transaction
now implement this interface. This provides a clear and explicit
contract for transactional operations.
- **Consolidated Transaction Logic**: The logic for starting,
committing, and rolling back transactions is now centralized within the
`transactionInvoker` and the `eventStoreInvoker`. The `EnsureTx` method
on `InvokeOpts` has been removed, and transaction handling is now
managed automatically by the invocation framework.
- **Improved Event Handling**: The `eventStoreInvoker` and its
`eventCollector` have been rewritten to be more robust and to correctly
handle nested and batched commands, ensuring that all events are
collected and published within the same transaction.
- **Code Cleanup**: A significant amount of now-unused code, including
the old `invoker_test.go`, has been removed. Various comments and
variable declarations have also been cleaned up.
- **Updated Command Implementations**: All commands in the `domain`
package (e.g., `ActivateOrgCommand`, `DeactivateOrgCommand`,
`DeleteOrgCommand`, `UpdateOrgCommand`) have been updated to use the new
`Transactional` interface where appropriate, removing manual transaction
management.
- **Enhanced Testing**: Tests have been added and updated to cover the
new transaction and event handling logic, ensuring the refactoring is
sound.
- **Use `PrimaryKeyCondition`**: Use the
`repository.PrimaryKeyCondition(...)` method instead of using
`database.And(...)` where possible.
These changes lead to a cleaner, more decoupled architecture for command
handling in ZITADEL.
---------
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
This PR implements the endpoints listed in #10445 using relational
tables.
- [x] UpdateOrganization
- [x] ListOrganizations
- [x] DeleteOrganization
- [x] DeactivateOrganization
- [x] ActivateOrganization
# How the Problems Are Solved
- **UpdateOrganization:** Implemented logic for `Validate()`,
`Execute()` and `Events()`. On CQRS side, updating an organization emits
events related to the organization and its domains. Separate commanders
have been made for the domain events so that their logic is run
accordingly and we keep separation of concerns. Implementation of the
domains is left to its own ticket.
Because some domain-related data is changed during the organization
update, its original values are saved as pointers inside
[UpdateOrgCommand](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/4f87cd8d0cfd75f290aa13c342e4939cecebef73/backend/v3/domain/org_update.go#L20).
These variables will be then used as input for the domain commanders
(that will run after the update organization one).
- **ListOrganizations:** Implemented logic for `Validate()`,
`Execute()`. Utility methods have been made to parse the input queries.
This commander is used both by the v2 and v2beta endpoint, so a
translation layer has been put in place to translate all v2beta requests
into v2. The commander strictly handles v2 request only.
The translation layer between v2beta and v2 APIs was made so to make it
simple to remove it once the v2beta APIs will be removed (a simple
deletion should suffice). A `converter` package [is
shipped](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/4f87cd8d0cfd75f290aa13c342e4939cecebef73/backend/v3/api/org/v2/convert/README.md#L5)
as well with instruction for removal. TODOs have been put in place all
over the code to indicate that the related piece of code needs to be
removed once v2beta -> v2 transition is complete.
- **DeleteOrganization:** Implemented logic for `Validate()`,
`Execute()` and `Events()`. The `Events()` method is mostly incomplete
as it requires a lot of data that is currently not retrievable due to
the lack of their relational tables.
- **DeactivateOrganization** and **ActivateOrganization**: Implemented
logic for `Validate()`, `Execute()` and `Events()`. No notable remarks.
👉 All endpoints return matching errors to the CQRS counterpart: this way
allows re-using the integration tests and
👉 All endpoints have been unit-tested through DB mocking
👉 A bunch of TODOs have been put in place for future reworks that are
needed (e.g. `Update()` method on repository should also return a
timestamp)
# Additional Changes
- A test utility method to allow mocking query options have been made.
This was necessary because `database.QueryOption` is a function and the
only comparison possible with functions is `nil` check. So, to mock
this, `database.QueryOption` is converted first to `database.QueryOpts`.
See 2276742adaef1998ea4844e1f0dca2079e45ccfb
- A `BaseCommand` has been created with the idea to collect methods that
are going to be needed by other commands. For the moment, it only offers
a method to convert query text operations from gRPC to `domain` model.
See bb85456dd101282fa76d2e2ad165eed4c8ef61b9
- SQL operations have been reworked to allow for queries using
`ContainsIgnoreCase`, `EndsWithIgnoreCase` and other `IgnoreCase`
operations. This change is pending approval and might be reworked. See
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/10704#discussion_r2392886177
# Additional Context
`UpdateOrganization` is partially working because the logic for handling
domain updates is not done (there is only a draft of the commanders to
showcase the call chain). See
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/10704#discussion_r2356143178
Permissions are not implemented as they are missing. See
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/10771
- Closes: #10445
---------
Co-authored-by: Silvan <[email protected]>
jmaretteandGitHub
Marco A.andGitHub
Livio SpringandGitHub
