# Which Problems Are Solved
When a user with no authentication methods attempted to log in, the
system always set `invite=true` in the verification flow, regardless of
whether their email was already verified. This could cause errors when
trying to send invite codes to already initialized users.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Added conditional logic to determine whether to send an invite code
based on the user's email verification status:
This prevents errors when attempting to send invite codes to users who
have already verified their email and been initialized, while still
properly handling new users who need invitation flows.
Closes#10671
# Which Problems Are Solved
Users with password authentication disabled in their organization were
seeing "Username Password not allowed!" error instead of being
redirected to their organization's configured Identity Provider. This
affected domain discovery and multi-tenancy use cases in Login V2.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Updated `redirectUserToIDP` to accept optional `userId` and
`organization` parameters
- Added fallback logic to check organization-level IDPs via
`getActiveIdentityProviders`
- Updated all call sites to pass appropriate organization context
- Added test coverage for the fallback behavior
# Additional Changes
- Consolidated duplicate logic by removing
`redirectUserToSingleIDPIfAvailable` function, which is now handled by
the unified `redirectUserToIDP` function
- improved error handling on verification page
---------
Co-authored-by: Ramon <[email protected]>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Replace this example text with a concise list of problems that this PR
solves.
For example:
- password complexity requirements have hardcoded English text
- password, loginname, register and verify components have hardcoded
Engilsh error messages/alerts
# How the Problems Are Solved
Replace this example text with a concise list of changes that this PR
introduces.
For example:
- adds i18n for password complexity requirements
- adds i18n for password, loginname, register and verify components
error messages/alerts
# Additional Changes
- small change in code/styles for icons in PasswordComplexity to make
sure that icons keep size
# Additional Context
N.A
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Kida <[email protected]>
Closes#10671
# Which Problems Are Solved
Users with only password authentication method were immediately shown an
error "Username Password not allowed" when
`loginSettings.allowUsernamePassword` was set to false. However, the IDP
flow could potentially allow the user to register a new account or link
an existing account, providing a better user experience than a dead-end
error.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Modified single password method case to attempt IDP redirect before
showing error
- This allows users to potentially register or link accounts through the
IDP flow instead of hitting an immediate error
- Only show error as last resort when no IDP alternative is available
<!--
Please inform yourself about the contribution guidelines on submitting a
PR here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#submit-a-pull-request-pr.
Take note of how PR/commit titles should be written and replace the
template texts in the sections below. Don't remove any of the sections.
It is important that the commit history clearly shows what is changed
and why.
Important: By submitting a contribution you agree to the terms from our
Licensing Policy as described here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/LICENSING.md#community-contributions.
-->
# Which Problems Are Solved
When deploying the login application behind proxies or using Vercel
rewrites (e.g., `zitadel.com/login` → `login-zitadel-qa.vercel.app`),
the application was using the internal rewritten host instead of the
original user-facing host. This caused several issues:
1. **Broken Password Reset Emails**: Email links contained internal
hosts like `login-zitadel-qa.vercel.app` instead of `zitadel.com`
2. **Inconsistent User Experience**: Users would see different domains
in various parts of the flow
3. **Security Concerns**: Internal infrastructure details were exposed
to end users
4. **Scattered Logic**: Host detection logic was duplicated across
multiple files with inconsistent error handling
# How the Problems Are Solved
Created comprehensive host detection utilities in `/lib/server/host.ts`
and `/lib/client/host.ts`:
**Server-side utilities:**
- `getOriginalHost()` - Returns the original user-facing host
- `getOriginalHostWithProtocol()` - Returns host with proper protocol
(http/https)
# Which Problems Are Solved
- The previous monorepo in monorepo structure for the login app and its
related packages was fragmented, complicated and buggy.
- The process for building and testing the login container was
inconsistent between local development and CI.
- Lack of clear documentation as well as easy and reliable ways for
non-frontend developers to reproduce and fix failing PR checks locally.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Consolidated the login app and its related npm packages by moving the
main package to `apps/login/apps/login` and merging
`apps/login/packages/integration` and `apps/login/packages/acceptance`
into the main `apps/login` package.
- Migrated from Docker Compose-based test setups to dev container-based
setups, adding support for multiple dev container configurations:
- `.devcontainer/base`
- `.devcontainer/turbo-lint-unit`
- `.devcontainer/turbo-lint-unit-debug`
- `.devcontainer/login-integration`
- `.devcontainer/login-integration-debug`
- Added npm scripts to run the new dev container setups, enabling exact
reproduction of GitHub PR checks locally, and updated the pipeline to
use these containers.
- Cleaned up Dockerfiles and docker-bake.hcl files to only build the
production image for the login app.
- Cleaned up compose files to focus on dev environments in dev
containers.
- Updated `CONTRIBUTING.md` with guidance on running and debugging PR
checks locally using the new dev container approach.
- Introduced separate Dockerfiles for the login app to distinguish
between using published client packages and building clients from local
protos.
- Ensured the login container is always built in the pipeline for use in
integration and acceptance tests.
- Updated Makefile and GitHub Actions workflows to use
`--frozen-lockfile` for installing pnpm packages, ensuring reproducible
installs.
- Disabled GitHub release creation by the changeset action.
- Refactored the `/build` directory structure for clarity and
maintainability.
- Added a `clean` command to `docks/package.json`.
- Experimentally added `knip` to the `zitadel-client` package for
improved linting of dependencies and exports.
# Additional Changes
- Fixed Makefile commands for consistency and reliability.
- Improved the structure and clarity of the `/build` directory to
support seamless integration of the login build.
- Enhanced documentation and developer experience for running and
debugging CI checks locally.
# Additional Context
- See updated `CONTRIBUTING.md` for new local development and debugging
instructions.
- These changes are a prerequisite for further improvements to the CI
pipeline and local development workflow.
- Closes#10276
Max PeintnerandGitHub
Elio BischofandGitHub