Commit Graph
11 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
5df8a97f9d feat(repository): implement user repository (#10967)
## Summary

This PR introduces the relational user repository for backend v3,
including schema, repository APIs, reducers/projections, and tests for
both human and machine users.

## What changed

* Added user-focused relational migrations (users, verifications,
metadata, PATs, machine keys, passkeys, identity provider links) and
related FK wiring.
* Implemented/expanded repository domain contracts and storage
implementations for human and machine user flows.
* Added support for machine secret handling and aligned access token
type modeling.
* Extended user domain models (verifications, password/email/phone/TOTP
state, passkeys, metadata, invite handling, identity provider links).
* Updated projection/reduction coverage and integration tests for key
user lifecycle events.
* Regenerated and updated mocks/enums plus supporting database
change/column utilities.

## Notes for reviewers

* This PR is large because it establishes the foundational relational
user storage layer and related test scaffolding. Sorry for that.

## Closes

Closes #10218
Closes #10224
Closes #10225
Closes #10209
Closes #10802

---------

Co-authored-by: Iraq Jaber <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tim Möhlmann <[email protected]>
2026-02-23 16:03:47 +01:00
4936bdf2c9 feat(rt): IDP Intents Relational Table (#11374)
# Which Problems Are Solved

In the context of moving our datastore to relational tables, Identity
Provider Intents have no definition of a relational table nor any DB API
that can be used to store the IDP intents as relational objects.

# How the Problems Are Solved

The PR follows the guidelines left in #11190

- A table `zitadel.identity_provider_intents` is created: it defines its
relational constraints (foreign keys) with the other tables, as well as
an ENUM to represent the state of the intent.
- An IDP Intent repository has been created, which offers CRUD
operations implemented as `Create`, `Get`, `Update` and `Delete` methods
for the IDP intent.
- The repository also defines all columns and conditions useful for
performing DB operations on the IDP intents.
- DB mocks have been added as well to ease testing on the `domain`
package.
- Reduction functions have been implemented for the existing IDP events
so to keep the relational table in sync with the event store.

# Additional Changes

To allow testing LDAP intent flow, the `Session.FetchUser()` method has
been extracted to a separate file. A corresponding mock has been created
as well in `fetch_user_mock.go`. The files are mutually excluded and
added at build time through go build tags: the mock is added when the
`integration` tag is specified, while the real implementation is added
when the same tag IS NOT added to the build tags.

# Additional Context

- Closes #11190

---------

Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Silvan <[email protected]>
2026-02-05 03:44:07 +00:00
Marco A.andGitHub 96bbd6a65c chore: management console naming inconsistency (#11390)
# Which Problems Are Solved

The following terms have all been renamed to management console:

- Customer Portal (when used to mean the console)
- Console
- Admin Console

# How the Problems Are Solved

- Search & Replace smartly
- Use Copilot for translation files

Changes done to: backend + frontend codebase, docs, translations and
protobufs (descriptions only)

# Additional Context

- Partially Closes #11279
2026-01-26 14:52:15 +00:00
Livio SpringandGitHub 4e6f68c511 feat(relational): implement session repository (#11109)
# Which Problems Are Solved

As part of going to a relation storage model, we need to implement the
repository for handling sessions and their events.

# How the Problems Are Solved

- Adds a migration step to create the necessary tables and types in the
database.
- Adds the repository implementation for sessions.
- Implements a projection handler for session events to handle the
events written by the old command handlers.
- Updates the `Session` type and `SessionRepository` interface:
  - added `CreatorID`
  - Adjusted `Delete` method to return amount of affected columns
  - Removed sub-repository clumns from the main interface
- Added `CreatorIDCondition`, `ExpirationCondition`, `ExistsFactor` and
`ExistsMetadata`
  - Removed `SetUserAgent`
- Methods of `SessionFactor` and `SessionChallenge` have been made
public
- fixed enumer on `SessionFactorType`
- Adds a `JSON` type to the repository package to easy can JSON columns,
resp. jsonb object inside a property of a `JSONArray` object.
- Adds a `NoChange` interface, which can be implemented to signal that a
`Change` interface implementation is not writing any changes to the
statement builder, e.g. `CTEChange`

# Additional Changes

- Fixes the operators enums. `TextOperations` had wrong comments and
`NumberOperations` additionally also had from comparisons.
- Fixes downgrade of migration step 008.

# Additional Context

- closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10212
2026-01-06 08:08:11 +01:00
8472c7683d feat(rt): authorizations (#11066)
# Which Problems Are Solved

This PR implements relational table and repository interface for the
authorizations feature as described in
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10767

# How the Problems Are Solved

By
* adding new `zitadel.authorizations` and `zitadel.authorization_roles`
tables
* implementing the `AuthorizationRepository` interface to create,
update, query, and delete user authorizations and roles
* implementing `authorization_relational.go` projection to update
`zitadel.authorizations` and `zitadel.authorization_roles` tables based
on events

# Additional Changes
N/A

# Additional Context
- Closes #10767

---------

Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <[email protected]>
2025-12-19 07:03:27 +01:00
b339a3e696 feat: instance domain APIs with relational tables (#11051)
# Which Problems Are Solved

This PR implements the endpoints listed in
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10444 .

# How the Problems Are Solved

The implementation follows the same pattern as the Instance one. The
`Add` and `Remove` are implementing the `Commander` interface, while
`List` Domains endpoints are implementing the `Querier` interace.

The PR adds also some forgotten calls to the relational logic for the
Instance API. The commits are identifiable by the label `instance:`
prepended to them. This is the complete list: bafce01b0 , 6fe7257ab ,
e27bc9c34 , 8133ede73 , fde667953 , a3e1135ed , ee1a6f9c1

# Additional Context

- Closes #10444

---------

Co-authored-by: Elio Bischof <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lebogang Phoshoko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Wim Van Laer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Max Peintner <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gayathri Vijayan <[email protected]>
2025-12-17 12:01:09 +01:00
3903355d18 feat(settings): add secret generator type to settings RT implementation (#11152)
# Which Problems Are Solved

The `SecretGenerators` setting is missing among the instance settings in
the new relational model.

# How the Problems Are Solved

This PR adds:
* `SettingTypeSecretGenerator` type to the settings model
* `SecretGeneratorSettingsRepository` and
`secretGeneratorSettingsJSONChanges` interfaces to set, retrieve, and
delete `secret_generator` settings, and corresponding unit tests.
* projection reducers to reduce the following events:
  * `SecretGeneratorAddedEvent`
  * `SecretGeneratorChangedEvent`
  * `SecretGeneratorRemovedEvent`
* integration tests to test that the events get reduced correctly 

# Additional Changes
N/A

# Additional Context
- Part of https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10207

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
2025-12-11 12:33:19 +01:00
f5ce288ea5 feat(domain): define user repositories (#11059)
This pull request introduces a new set of domain models and repositories
for managing users within the new v3 structure. The goal is to establish
a clean, robust, and extensible foundation for user management.

### Summary

This PR accomplishes the following:

- **Polymorphic User Model**: Introduces a `User` model in user.go that
can represent either a `Human` or a `Machine` user. This provides a
unified way to handle different user types while allowing for specific
attributes and logic for each.
- **Repository Pattern**: Implements the repository pattern for
accessing and manipulating user data. This decouples the business logic
from the data storage implementation. The main repository interfaces
(`UserRepository`, `HumanUserRepository`, `MachineUserRepository`) are
now defined in `backend/v3/domain/user_repository.go`.
- **Comprehensive User Models**: The user.go file now also defines the
domain models for associated user data, including `UserMetadata`,
`IdentityProviderLink`, `Passkey`, `PersonalAccessToken`, and
`MachineKey`.
- **Generic Verification and Check System**: Introduces verification.go
and check.go to provide a standardized way of handling various
verification flows (e.g., email verification, OTP checks).
- **Generated Code**: Adds new generated files for enums
(`humangender_enumer.go`, `machinekeytype_enumer.go`,
`passkeytype_enumer.go`, `personalaccesstokentype_enumer.go`,
`userstate_enumer.go`, `usertype_enumer.go`) and mocks for the new
repositories.
- **Session Domain Refactoring**: Updates the session domain
(`backend/v3/domain/session*.go`) to align with the new user model
structure.

This foundational work paves the way for migrating user management logic
to the new `v3` backend, with a more maintainable and testable
architecture.

part of #10224

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
2025-11-25 11:54:32 +01:00
Marco A.andGitHub 39a29f534a feat(domain): Instance APIs with relational tables (#10953)
# Which Problems Are Solved

This PR implements the endpoints listed in
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/10443 .

# How the Problems Are Solved

The implementation follows the same pattern as the Organization one.
There are no peculiarities to this PR. The `Update`, `Delete` are
implementing the `Commander` interface, while `Get` and `List`
instance(s) endpoints are implementing the `Querier` interace.

# Additional Context

- Closes #10443
- Depends on #10445
2025-10-28 14:17:19 +00:00
c4221a9c0f refactor: invoker implementations and clean up code (#10962)
This pull request refactors the command execution and transaction
handling logic within the `domain` package. The primary goal is to
simplify the invoker chain, clarify transaction management, and improve
the overall structure for better maintainability and readability.

### Key Changes:

- **Simplified Invoker Chain**: The previous chain of invokers has been
refactored. A new `transactionInvoker` is introduced to explicitly
manage database transactions for commands that require them. This
responsibility is no longer spread across different parts of the
invocation flow.
- **`Transactional` Interface**: A new `Transactional` interface has
been introduced. Commands that need to run within a database transaction
now implement this interface. This provides a clear and explicit
contract for transactional operations.
- **Consolidated Transaction Logic**: The logic for starting,
committing, and rolling back transactions is now centralized within the
`transactionInvoker` and the `eventStoreInvoker`. The `EnsureTx` method
on `InvokeOpts` has been removed, and transaction handling is now
managed automatically by the invocation framework.
- **Improved Event Handling**: The `eventStoreInvoker` and its
`eventCollector` have been rewritten to be more robust and to correctly
handle nested and batched commands, ensuring that all events are
collected and published within the same transaction.
- **Code Cleanup**: A significant amount of now-unused code, including
the old `invoker_test.go`, has been removed. Various comments and
variable declarations have also been cleaned up.
- **Updated Command Implementations**: All commands in the `domain`
package (e.g., `ActivateOrgCommand`, `DeactivateOrgCommand`,
`DeleteOrgCommand`, `UpdateOrgCommand`) have been updated to use the new
`Transactional` interface where appropriate, removing manual transaction
management.
- **Enhanced Testing**: Tests have been added and updated to cover the
new transaction and event handling logic, ensuring the refactoring is
sound.
- **Use `PrimaryKeyCondition`**: Use the
`repository.PrimaryKeyCondition(...)` method instead of using
`database.And(...)` where possible.

These changes lead to a cleaner, more decoupled architecture for command
handling in ZITADEL.

---------

Co-authored-by: Marco A. <[email protected]>
2025-10-27 14:04:06 +00:00
f04d873270 feat(domain): Organization APIs with relational tables (#10704)
# Which Problems Are Solved

This PR implements the endpoints listed in #10445 using relational
tables.

- [x] UpdateOrganization
- [x] ListOrganizations
- [x] DeleteOrganization
- [x] DeactivateOrganization
- [x] ActivateOrganization

# How the Problems Are Solved

- **UpdateOrganization:** Implemented logic for `Validate()`,
`Execute()` and `Events()`. On CQRS side, updating an organization emits
events related to the organization and its domains. Separate commanders
have been made for the domain events so that their logic is run
accordingly and we keep separation of concerns. Implementation of the
domains is left to its own ticket.

Because some domain-related data is changed during the organization
update, its original values are saved as pointers inside
[UpdateOrgCommand](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/4f87cd8d0cfd75f290aa13c342e4939cecebef73/backend/v3/domain/org_update.go#L20).

These variables will be then used as input for the domain commanders
(that will run after the update organization one).
- **ListOrganizations:** Implemented logic for `Validate()`,
`Execute()`. Utility methods have been made to parse the input queries.
This commander is used both by the v2 and v2beta endpoint, so a
translation layer has been put in place to translate all v2beta requests
into v2. The commander strictly handles v2 request only.

The translation layer between v2beta and v2 APIs was made so to make it
simple to remove it once the v2beta APIs will be removed (a simple
deletion should suffice). A `converter` package [is
shipped](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/4f87cd8d0cfd75f290aa13c342e4939cecebef73/backend/v3/api/org/v2/convert/README.md#L5)
as well with instruction for removal. TODOs have been put in place all
over the code to indicate that the related piece of code needs to be
removed once v2beta -> v2 transition is complete.
- **DeleteOrganization:** Implemented logic for `Validate()`,
`Execute()` and `Events()`. The `Events()` method is mostly incomplete
as it requires a lot of data that is currently not retrievable due to
the lack of their relational tables.
- **DeactivateOrganization** and **ActivateOrganization**: Implemented
logic for `Validate()`, `Execute()` and `Events()`. No notable remarks.

👉 All endpoints return matching errors to the CQRS counterpart: this way
allows re-using the integration tests and

👉 All endpoints have been unit-tested through DB mocking

👉 A bunch of TODOs have been put in place for future reworks that are
needed (e.g. `Update()` method on repository should also return a
timestamp)

# Additional Changes

- A test utility method to allow mocking query options have been made.
This was necessary because `database.QueryOption` is a function and the
only comparison possible with functions is `nil` check. So, to mock
this, `database.QueryOption` is converted first to `database.QueryOpts`.
See 2276742adaef1998ea4844e1f0dca2079e45ccfb

- A `BaseCommand` has been created with the idea to collect methods that
are going to be needed by other commands. For the moment, it only offers
a method to convert query text operations from gRPC to `domain` model.
See bb85456dd101282fa76d2e2ad165eed4c8ef61b9

- SQL operations have been reworked to allow for queries using
`ContainsIgnoreCase`, `EndsWithIgnoreCase` and other `IgnoreCase`
operations. This change is pending approval and might be reworked. See
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/10704#discussion_r2392886177

# Additional Context

`UpdateOrganization` is partially working because the logic for handling
domain updates is not done (there is only a draft of the commanders to
showcase the call chain). See
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/10704#discussion_r2356143178

Permissions are not implemented as they are missing. See
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/10771

- Closes: #10445

---------

Co-authored-by: Silvan <[email protected]>
2025-10-21 15:27:38 +02:00