mirror of
https://github.com/andwati/zitadel.git
synced 2026-10-30 11:02:16 +00:00
feat: Feature flag for relational tables (#10599)
# Which Problems Are Solved This PR introduces a new feature flag `EnableRelationalTables` that will be used in following implementations to decide whether Zitadel should use the relational model or the event sourcing one. # TODO - [x] Implement flag at system level - [x] Display the flag on console: https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/10615 # How the Problems Are Solved - Implement loading the flag from config - Add persistence of the flag through gRPC endpoint (SetInstanceFeatures) - Implement reading of the flag through gRPC endpoint (GetInstanceFeatures) # Additional Changes Some minor refactoring to remove un-needed generics annotations # Additional Context - Closes #10574 --------- Co-authored-by: Silvan <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ func (m *SystemFeaturesReadModel) Query() *eventstore.SearchQueryBuilder {
|
||||
feature_v2.SystemEnableBackChannelLogout,
|
||||
feature_v2.SystemLoginVersion,
|
||||
feature_v2.SystemPermissionCheckV2,
|
||||
feature_v2.SystemEnableRelationalTables,
|
||||
).
|
||||
Builder().ResourceOwner(m.ResourceOwner)
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -96,6 +97,8 @@ func reduceSystemFeatureSet[T any](features *SystemFeatures, event *feature_v2.S
|
||||
features.LoginV2.set(level, event.Value)
|
||||
case feature.KeyPermissionCheckV2:
|
||||
features.PermissionCheckV2.set(level, event.Value)
|
||||
case feature.KeyEnableRelationalTables:
|
||||
features.EnableRelationalTables.set(level, event.Value)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user